The Post-Partisan Emporium

  A Global Chorus of Pretence to Halt the Gaza Bloodbath. The New World Order’s “Global Welfare” By  Julian Rose For those who have failed to recognise the true colours of the global institutions charged with acting for world peace, health and human rights, it will surely come as a shock to realise that such international bodies are part of the problem and not the solution. They are complicit in the carefully planned entanglement agenda which obscures truth, strings out discussion and evades taking action, while presenting themselves as ‘the caring face of global welfare’. These bodies are agents of the elite globalist push for ‘A New World Order’, top down power now going for full spectrum dominance. Heading this list must be  The United Nations, followed closely by The World Health Organisation and the World Economic Forum. These three institutions are in fact, inseparably joined at the hip. UN-WEF Partnership  There are many more such groupings, of course, but it’s beyond the scope

  The "they're all in it together" rebuttal canard Multipolarity is a crock IAIN DAVIS I am among a relatively small group of independent researchers and journalists who question the proposed multipolar world order. One of the objections often thrown my (and our) way—by those who presumably support a new world order led by the BRICS+ group of nations—is that we critics of multipolarity are claiming, with regard to national governments, that "they're all in it together." Having never once made that argument, constantly refuting it is very annoying. So let me outline why the "they're all in it together" rebuttal is a canard. Essentially the "all in it together" response runs something like this:  By only highlighting all the areas of agreement between East and West you are overlooking the very real geopolitical differences and conflicts between the two. You are claiming Putin is a WEF stooge and that Xi is a puppet of the White House. W