Posts

Showing posts with the label Unitaid

Sleuthing Connections to Suppression of Medicine

Image
Sleuthing Connections to Suppression of Medicine Mathew Crawford The pandemonium has been so much chaotic…chaos that I've never even written up all the interesting details and connections that I noted along the way, but this tweet reminded me of one. Alexandros Marinos @alexandrosM Phil Harper just had a major breakthrough in the investigation of the Andrew Hill meta-analysis. The name of Andrew Owen, Prof at University of Liverpool and UNITAID grantee appears in the metadata of some digital versions of Andrew Hill's meta-analysis. Professor tied to altered Andrew Hill paper also prepared ‘Ivermectin Evidence’ for World Health Organisation Part 3: Who is Andrew Owen? philharper.substack.com March 7th 2022 162 Retweets 418 Likes First, let's take a look at what Phil Harper uncovered (or the part you can read without a subscription): The Digger Professor tied to altered Andrew Hill paper also prepared 'Ivermectin Evidence' for World Health Organisation Ivermectin P

Who Manages Unitaid? Context Behind the Lawrie-Hill conversation

Image
Who Manages Unitaid? Context Behind the Lawrie-Hill conversation The Chloroquine Wars Part CIV Mathew Crawford " Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome. " -Charlie Munger Apologies for the substantial background behind this article up front. The payoff is large. Like  mega-Nicki Minaj large . Earlier this month,  an article  by  author  and medical and science correspondent  Neville Hodgkinson  circulated and created a buzz.  The article leads with brief discussions of the endemic fraud and corruption in the biomedical sciences , A leading UK cancer specialist told me years ago how he was blackmailed by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund into staying silent over a fraudulent study the fund had sponsored. Published in the Lancet, the study purported to show that patients treated holistically through the  Bristol Cancer Help Centre  did worse than those who had only orthodox treatment. It was junk science, aimed at discrediting the charity whose work had gained pr