The Post-Partisan Emporium

Belfries Simplicius The systems of our control, we are led to believe, are necessary things. It is a topic I touched on in the recent article  Measures of Control .   We are taught that to question these systems is to undermine the very foundation beneath our feet. Similarly, the ‘leaders’ of our world have shaped the perception of their positions so as to bolster them with an aura of sanctity. In reality, research shows just how superfluous leaders of companies or institutions really are. “Leaders are often thought to be instrumental to the performance of the organizations they lead. However, considerable research suggests that their influence over organizational performance might actually be minimal. These claims of leader irrelevance pose a puzzle: If leaders are relatively insignificant, why would someone commit to leading?” - Source One example amongst several studies showing that the CEO of an organization is mostly a symbolic figurehead and pushes the needle much less than most

  The Trojan Horse of the Pandemic Genomics, Nanotechnology, and the Transhumanistic Agenda BODHISATTVAS BETTY Since its onset, the origins of the pandemic have been a subject of ongoing debate, ranging from the initial narrative of a natural zoonotic transfer to humans to speculations involving a viral bioweapon and potential laboratory leaks. Initial reports in late 2019 suggested an epidemic caused by a zoonotic virus spreading from Wuhan, China, with the belief that it originated from an animal reservoir at a live-animal market. However, there continues to be speculation about alternative sources of blame for the pandemic's origins, and responsibility has been attributed to various sources. In March 2020, the  US Department of State called upon the Chinese ambassador  to express dissatisfaction with remarks made by a Chinese spokesperson. The spokesperson had suggested that the virus was introduced to Wuhan by the US military, purportedly as a bioweapon. Following this, a US se