Letter to a Holocaust Denier
Letter to a Holocaust Denier
“‘Oh, things seeped through somehow, always quietly, always indirectly. So people heard rumors, and the rest they could guess. Of course, most people did not believe the stories of Jews or other opponents of the regime. It was naturally thought that such persons would all exaggerate.’
“Rumors, guesses enough to make a man know if he wanted badly to know, or at least to believe, and always involving persons who would be suspected, ‘naturally,’ of exaggerating. Goebbels’ immediate subordinate in charge of radio in the Propaganda Ministry testified at Nuremberg that he had heard of the gassing of Jews, and went to Goebbels with the report. Goebbels said it was false, ‘enemy propaganda,’ and that was the end of it.”
—Milton Mayer, They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 (paperback, Kindle, audiobook)
You ignore eyewitness testimonies from victims and perpetrators alike.
You dismiss the deaths of countless victims, attributing it to other causes.
You doubt the survivors’ stories about their experiences and losses.
You think the monumental amount of bureaucratic, photographic, and film documentary evidence is faked or misinterpreted.
You believe the propagandists when they tell you the rumors are enemy propaganda.
You cherry-pick secondary sources that corroborate your convictions.
You cling to your faith in an insupportable position with the fervency of a Scientologist.
You use every opportunity to evangelize.
You attack anyone who presents evidence to the contrary.
You feel those who believe the accounts of witnesses and survivors need to be “educated” about the “truth.”
You valorize the genocidists and expectorate upon their targets.
You sanction the disciplining, ostracization, and even incarceration of the designated enemies.
You devise labyrinthine explanations to discredit the incontrovertible proof of mass murder.
You refuse to believe that degree of evil could be orchestrated on such an immense scale when it requires the participation and willing silence of so many colluders.
You mock the suffering of people who lost loved ones or endured permanent afflictions.
You build a wall to repel threatening facts and lock yourself inside a circle of fellow deniers who reinforce your beliefs.
Oh wait, you thought I was talking about the World War II Holocaust?
No, no. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I’m talking about the Holocaust that’s happening at this very moment—and on a scale Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Idi Amin, Kim Il-Sung, Pinochet, and Pol Pot would never have dared conceive.
And I’m talking to you, the propaganda-suckling, pro-censorship, pro-slavery, anti-reality, anti-humanity totalitarianism apologist who is denying the validity of millions of medical reports regarding adverse reactions, including tens of thousands of deaths.
Oh, that’s right, you poo-poo VAERS and similar surveillance systems as a “dropbox” where anyone can submit reports—that’s the talking point your persuaders have sledgehammered into your spin-washed and fabric-softened brain, right?
Do realize that whatever twaddle you’ve heard about VAERS from the BigPharma–Big Brother–Big Media–Big Tech propaganda complex was concocted to smear a reporting system that has been successfully used in the early detection of adverse events for three decades, is frequently referenced in peer-reviewed papers, is understood in the scientific community to be significantly underreported, and has been used to pull previous vaccines after as few as 15 reports of adverse events in the past (that is, when pharmaceutical corporations actually had to face the possibility of liability for their products and hadn’t been guaranteed impunity via Emergency Use Authorizations).
This CDC article, for example, notes:
“On July 16, 1999, CDC recommended that health-care providers suspend use of the licensed rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant-tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV) (RotaShield®, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Marietta, Pennsylvania) in response to 15 cases of intussusception.… By July 6, 1999, the number of cases reported to VAERS had increased to 15, a higher number than expected, accounting for likely underreporting, available baseline estimates of intussusception, and the estimated number of doses of RRV-TV distributed.… [B]ecause VAERS is a national surveillance system with a simple reporting mechanism, it yields timely information and has high sensitivity for new vaccine safety concerns. Despite estimated underreporting of intussusception after RRV-TV of approximately 50% (7), VAERS successfully provided an alert.”
Let’s take a little tour through the peer-reviewed science on VAERS and see what we find out.
But first, let’s address the matter of correlation and causation since “correlation does not equal causation” is one of the regularly regurgitated bullet points from the VAERS disinformation campaign.
The American Council on Science & Health notes:
“It is oft-repeated that correlation does not imply causation. But it does. That’s precisely why epidemiologists and economists are so fascinated by correlations. Thus, it is far more accurate to say that correlation does not prove causation.”
That is where Hill’s Criteria of Causality comes in. It can be used to assess causation in cases of statistically anomalous correlations—like the colossal ones that started occurring in January 2021 and have been rising at historically unprecedented rates ever since.
Dr. Jessica Rose, a viral immunologist and computational virologist with a PhD in computational biology and two postdoc degrees in molecular biology, demonstrated the satisfaction of the Bradford Hill criteria in a recent presentation, but it doesn’t take a PhD and an understanding of statistics to see what is glaringly obvious to anyone who hasn’t been lobotomized by BigPharma propaganda.
You can review the latest data and read reports for yourself at OpenVAERS, including mortality data. Igor Chudov offers some tips on assessing your localized VAERS data in this article debunking the debunkers.
Recently published in Science, Public Health Policy, & the Law, this peer-reviewed paper by Dr. Rose assesses VAERS pharmacovigilance. Her August 27 presentation to the Canadian COVID Care Alliance also provides a detailed analysis of the VAERS data, including compelling proof of causation:
On September 17, 2021, COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF) Founder Steve Kirsch delivered a bombshell presentation to the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (full hearing available here, with Steve’s presentation starting @ 04:20:14; I recommend sticking around for Dr. David Wiseman’s presentation following Steve’s):
His trenchant PowerPoint is well worth downloading, reviewing, and sharing.
According to the analysis in this exhaustive document authored by Dr. Rose, Steve Kirsch, and Mathew Crawford, “The vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans so far.” Notice that is Americans only. That doesn’t include deaths and adverse reactions tracked in other surveillance systems such as EudraVigilance (note the videos after the statistics), the UK’s Yellow Card system, and Australia’s Database of Adverse Event Notifications (see my analysis of data from the latter in the Down Under Edition of my Recommendations Roundup).
If you’re still skeptical of the validity of VAERS data, let’s rewind to pre-2021 to see how peer-reviewed papers describe it. This quote, taken from a paper titled, The Reporting Sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for Anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré Syndrome, is one of hundreds of such examples:
“Underreporting is a limitation common to passive surveillance systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) that monitors the safety of U.S.-licensed vaccines. Nonetheless, previous reports demonstrate substantial case capture for clinically severe adverse events (AEs).” —Vaccine (October 2020)
Also published in Vaccine, the paper Causality Assessment of Adverse Events Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) concludes:
“Using VAERS reports and additional documentation, causality could be assessed by expert review in the majority of VAERS reports.” (November 2012)
The VAERS website itself explains:
“‘Underreporting’ is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report. Physicians and patients understand that minor side effects of vaccinations often include this kind of discomfort, as well as low fevers. On the other hand, more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones, especially when they occur soon after vaccination, even if they may be coincidental and related to other causes.”
And if VAERS is so unreliable—as BigPharma sock puppets suddenly started claiming in 2021—why does the CDC admit to using it in its determination about whether or not to recall a vaccine?
“CDC analyzed reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to search for any side effects that might have been caused by the irregularity …”
If you’re still a denier after having read this far, Swiss Policy Research provides rigorous documentation for some of the more common injuries on their Covid Vaccine Adverse Events page.
At risk to his own career and even life, Funeral Directer John O’Looney recently disclosed his harrowing firsthand experiences of mortality dating back to November 2019.
In this revelatory interview, (now-terminated) Hospitalist Physician’s Assistant Deborah Conrad explains how VAERS reporting works and describes the surge in adverse events she witnessed. (If you watch only one video from this article, make it this one.)
ICU physician Patricia Lee, MD, recently submitted this letter to the FDA documenting the alarming number of anomalous post-injection injuries and fatalities she has seen in her ward. That courageous act has led eleven other physicians to follow suit so far.
I understand peer-reviewed papers and abstract statistics may convince your head but not your heart. That is one reason it was necessary for Facebook to delete the 120,000-member group where people who have been injured by and lost loved ones to the injections could commiserate and share their experiences. Think about the vicious cruelty of such an act. And also consider the size of that group—120,000 members by April, just a few months after the rollout.
When ABC put out a call on Facebook for stories of unvaxxed COVID deaths, they were instead flooded with hundreds of thousands of responses (257,000 as of this writing) from those suffering heartrending losses or injuries caused by the “cure.” Something tells me ABC won’t be covering those stories.
The Testimonies Project shares stories of vaccine-injured and grieving family members from Israel, and there are innumerable accounts of those who’ve died following injection, such as this 32-year-old man named Benjamin, 19-year-old Simone Scott, 18-year-old Camilla Canepa, a 12-year-old child, 21-year-old personal trainer Shawn Kuhn, 23-year-old army conscript Khanti Anantasiri, this 22-year-old French man, 37-year-old Jessica Berg Wilson, 35-year-old Anne VanGeest, 43-year-old Brad Malagarie, 60-year-old Sandra Jacobs, BBC radio presenter Lisa Shaw, Pakistani Police Superintendent Malik Mahmood, Indian actor Vivek, numerous professional athletes, multiple pilots, and a bevy of other victims whose cause of death was listed as a short illness to obscure the cause.
New York University Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication Mark Crispin Miller documents more spike casualties here, here, and here.
Those who don’t suffer fatalities may wind up with debilitating, painful, and life-threatening afflictions, such as 18-year-old Emma Burkey; 17-year-old Everest Romney; a 17-year-old previously healthy male; SPARTN Monkey Rescue Founder Michael Robison; NBA player Brandon Goodwin; soccer player Sergio Agüero, 28-year-old Emil Pálsson, and baseball player Daniel Brito1; and mountain biker Kyle Warner:
When 12-year-old Maddie De Garay volunteered for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial for adolescents, she lost feeling from the waist down and became wheelchair-bound and dependent on a feeding tube, as her mother describes in this disquieting interview and this public hearing. Pfizer appears to have no interest in investigating the “side effects” their trial was supposedly designed to identify.
Way back in early January 2021, right after the inoculation program was launched in Ireland, award-winning investigative journalist Gemma O’Doherty gave a comprehensive summation in which she exposed some of the casualties and adverse effects that began occurring immediately after injection.
And since you’re so fond of Listening To The Experts™, here’s what a few actual experts have to say on the matter.
Still a denier? Then you’d better turn in your moral superiority card when it comes to the “good Germans,” who trusted their government, their media, their leaders, their doctors, their scientists, their educators, their corporations, and every other representative of the State tapping into people’s fears of disease and death to divide the followers from the freethinkers and dehumanize the branded enemy.
And you’d certainly better stop sneering at your Holocaust denier predecessors, much less deluding yourself into believing you’re on “the right side of history.”
Reconsidering your position? Great. Now you can be part of the solution—instead of the Final Solution.
You can start by doing your own renegade research outside the approved parameters à la The Nasty Girl:
The 10 Stages of Genocide: We Are at #10
Perhaps you missed it amidst the hurricane of hysteria and distractions swirling around us since March 2020, but we are already at Stage 10 (Denial) of The Ten Stages of Genocide, developed by Dr. Gregory H. Stanton in 1996.
Having learned from the PR failures of past genocidal regimes, today’s perpetrators cunningly implemented #10 concurrently with #9 (Extermination).
Let’s update the definitions for the present democide underway:
1) Classification
Well, this one’s so obvious, even a Holocaust denier can’t miss it. You’re either vaxxed or unvaxxed, pro-vaxx or anti-vaxx. As Goebbels says:
“Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.”
2) Symbolization
I find the current implementation of this stage especially fascinating. In a deviously clever maneuver, the strategists formulating this aspect of the campaign inverted the traditional symbol of identification from an imposed mark of humiliation to one the ingroup ecstatically embraced—hence my inspiration for The Yellow Star Series. Those obeying the State’s authoritarian commandments virtue-signal their altruism with masks, while those who fail to don this sign of subservience are shamed and may even face jail time and extortionate fines.
3) Discrimination
Don’t have your vaxxport? Well, you will simply be “locked out” of society, relieved of your job (sans unemployment benefits), deprived of access to necessities, and quarantined—Noam Chomsky is all for it! And, if you can stomach this clip, so is Bill-da-Blah-sio:
4) Dehumanization
Throughout this Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated™, the non-injected have been portrayed as Selfish™ Spreaders Of Disease™ who should be denied medical procedures for being a Threat To The Public Health™. I examine the process of gradual dehumanization in more detail in Letter to a Covidian.
5) Organization
In an expertly organized fashion, the WHO, CDC, FDA, alphabet agencies, Big Media, Big Tech, BigPharma, Big Education, and Big Brother have all coordinated to “flood the zone” with Big Lies and enact the associated totalitarian policies those lies are being deployed to justify.
6) Polarization
Epitomized by Don “Sorbette” Lemon and paramour Chris “Fredo” Cuomo, hate-mongering extremist outlets like CNN specialize in the art of polarization:
7) Preparation
From the Rockefeller Foundation’s Operation Lockstep to Event 201, the authoritarian measures instituted to “manage” the “pandemic” were formulated far in advance. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security was kind enough to prepare a highlights reel for us (published November 4, 2019):
8) Persecution
When Karens feel entitled to accost unmasked strangers at Walmart; cops are empowered to brutalize dissenters (see “Scenes from the Police State of Australia” in my Recommendations Roundup: Down Under Edition) so badly you get the Human Rights Watch’s attention (and that was in September 2020, when measures were still mild); and dicktators fearlessly demand permanent emergency powers and outsource unconstitutional mandates to employers, persecution is a daily experience for nonconformists.
9) Extermination
Self-appointed demigod billionaires like Bill Gates and Davos/World Economic Forum (WEF) megavillain Klaus Schwab unabashedly discuss the need for depopulation and a Great Reset. Prince Philip—who said, “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus to contribute something to solving overpopulation”—even joined in. There is mounting evidence that depopulation is already occurring (see above), and it was foretold as far back as 1981 by one-time François Mitterand special advisor Jacques Attali. Below are a few salient quotes from an interview conducted by Michel Salomon2:
“I believe rather in implicit totalitarianism with an invisible and decentralized ‘Big Brother.’ These machines for monitoring our health, which we could have for our own good, will enslave us for our own good. In a way, we will be subjected to gentle and permanent conditioning.”
“[W]ith genetic engineering we could gradually create the conditions for humanity to assume itself freely, but collectively, or else create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made up of copies of humans sold to humans, chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work.”
“[T]he extension of life expectancy is no longer an objective desired by the logic of power. Because as long as it was a question of extending life expectancy in order to reach the maximum profitability threshold of the human machine, in terms of work, it was perfect.
“But as soon as you go beyond 60/65, people live longer than they produce and they cost society dearly.”
“Indeed, from the point of view of society, it is much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt than for it to deteriorate gradually.”
“As a socialist, I am objectively opposed to extending life because it is an illusion, a false problem.”
“Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies in all cases. In a socialist logic, to begin with, the problem is as follows: socialist logic is freedom and fundamental freedom is suicide; consequently, the right to direct or indirect suicide is an absolute value in this type of society. In a capitalist society, killing machines, prostheses that will make it possible to eliminate life when it is too unbearable or economically too costly, will come into being and will be common practice. I therefore believe that euthanasia, whether it is a value of freedom or a commodity, will be one of the rules of future society.”
“Medicine is indicative of the evolution of a society that is moving towards a decentralized totalitarianism. We can already see a certain conscious or unconscious desire to conform as much as possible to social norms.”
“If from an economic point of view, children are a commodity like any other, society also considers them as such, but for social reasons.”
“It is clear that the discourse on prevention, health economics and good medical practice will lead to the need for each individual to have a medical file which will be put on a magnetic tape. For epidemiological reasons, all these files will be centralized in a computer to which doctors will have access.”
“I believe that we are leaving a universe controlled by energy to enter the universe of information. If matter is energy, life is information. This is why the major producer of tomorrow’s society will be living matter. Thanks in particular to genetic engineering, it will produce new therapeutic weapons, food and energy.”
10) Denial
This scarcely needs supporting evidence because all you need do is turn on the television, peruse Big Tech–sterilized social media, and observe the continually escalating censorship endemic to totalitarianism, and you will be immersed in denialist propaganda. Whereas the media is incessantly trumpeting reports of COVID cases (dramatically inflated through manipulation of PCR tests) and deaths to induce a frequency illusion, it makes no mention of the 837,593 adverse reactions, including 17,619 deaths, reported in VAERS (through October 22, 2021) and provides no coverage of human interest stories featuring those who died or suffered injuries following injection.
As Dr. Deborah Birx admitted, the COVID death tallies constitute deaths with (not of) COVID, meaning anyone who died of old age, comorbidities, or any other cause while testing positive using a faulty testing system was tallied as a COVID death. Even with that manipulation, the mortality rate is so infinitesimal (0.9797 as of this writing), the WHO had to rely on its neutered definition of “pandemic” (conveniently redefined during the Swine Flu “pandemic” to exclude “enormous numbers of deaths and illness”) to invoke the National Emergencies Act in March 2020.
If, after reading and viewing everything referenced above, you are still a Holocaust denier, then congratulations, you have proven the effectiveness of Stage #10.
If, on the other hand, you are finally heeding your long-suppressed intuition that not all is as portrayed about this narrative, then welcome to objective reality, rational discourse, and sanity. Now, we can begin our expedition for the truth together, unsullied by propaganda, biases, and preconceptions.
Voltaire says:
“Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
Once you cease believing absurdities, you can no longer be manipulated into committing atrocities.
© Margaret Anna Alice, LLC
If you liked this post from Margaret Anna Alice Through the Looking Glass, why not share it? You can also Buy Me a Coffee or donate via PayPal to free me to spend more time writing and researching in my aim to unmask tyranny. I thank you for reading, thinking, sharing, and supporting my work in whichever ways you choose.
Note: Purchasing any items using Amazon affiliate links included in my content will further support my efforts to unmask tyranny.
October Surprise: Extended Through 11/15/21!
Surprise! Now through November 15, you will receive a beautifully illustrated and typeset e-book of my fairy tale when you sign up for an annual subscription.
Since I published my last article two weeks ago, I have been honored to welcome 358 new readers to my mailing list! I am also immensely grateful to those of you who have become paid subscribers—especially those who have taken the extraordinary step of becoming a Founding Member. I currently have 49 subscribers, and I hope you will consider adding yourself to that number to help make this endeavor sustainable.
If you feel the work I am doing is worthwhile and want to make it possible for me to spend more time writing and researching, please consider supporting me, whether it be by subscribing, donating, buying me a coffee, or sharing my posts.
These players’ vaccination status has not yet been officially confirmed, but on September 16, Sergio Agüero called for everyone 12 and over to get injected, and there are claims that Barcelona has a 99.9-percent vaccination rate, suggesting a high probability of injection. Emil Pálsson falls into the 16–29 age bracket, which is 84 percent fully vaccinated in Iceland. There are multiple claims that Daniel Brito was fully vaccinated, although I have not found definitive proof.
I have not been able to corroborate the Attali quote predicting a pandemic and fatal treatment that has been circulating online. I scanned the original text using my très rouillée college French, and there are elements of overlap, but the quote appears to be a very loose translation with some conspicuous additions. I suggest avoiding sharing that quote (which I regrettably did in a comment before performing a full investigation) to avoid any potential accusations of “fake news.” That said, the verified quotes I cited above are more than damning in and of themselves.
Comments
Post a Comment