The Post-Partisan Emporium

  Are they planning a false flag event in London? Very nearly all of London's Webcams went dark in early September. Why? Alex Krainer Yesterday, as I was finalizing my new report on Great Britain, an update to my August 26 article " The Coming Collapse of Britain ," YouTube randomly suggested to me a short video by one  Craig Houston  titled, " Why are ALL LONDON webcams offline...? " I was nearly floored: Mr. Houston looked through hundreds of Webcams across London and could not find a single one that was live. See for yourself  here  and  here ! That's extremely odd: clearly,  someone  made the decision to switch them all off - they couldn't all have failed randomly. One of the webcams over the Westminster bridge displayed the last image it recorded: it was on 2 September 2024 at 16:51, which at least gives us a clue about when the Heart of Darkness went dark to the world. I posted a comment about this in my  TrendCompass report  yesterday and one of t

The Surprise of Hazel Israel Shamir   Russians have the quaintest ways to name their weapon systems. They name them after flowers: geranium, hyacinth, tulip. They give them female names: Katyusha, Tatjana. They might use the moniker of a favourite doll, like Pinocchio. Today it is Hazel, translated in Russian as Oreshnik, the latest medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile with multiple nuclear-capable warheads. This little number was recently tested at the Yuzhmash plant in Dnepropetrovsk (or ‘Dnepr’, as it is called by the Ukrainians). It is a lethal beast that no Western defence system can stop as it approaches at the astounding speed of Mach 10. All the world’s militaries began to scramble upon news of its first operational flight, but once it gets fitted with nuclear warheads – it will truly terrify. What would be a worthy target for such a devastating monster? Who should be first to be obliterated once WW3 starts? It seems like too much power to waste on Ukrainians. Who really d

  Epstein's client list is out Ryan Dawson Some people ask me how I got the Epstein list. People are naive thinking there is a list sitting in a locker somewhere Like some 1960s Batman villain wrote it all down and saved it. That doesn't exist. I compiled the list the way any real journalist should. Page 1 of the Epstein Client list of 3 pages It's from the victims own mouths. It's from internal emails between Epstein and his clients boasting about what they did. It's from the court documents and quiet settlements with hush money delivered by his lawyer Daren Indyke. It's from massive payments to Epstein run LLCs by these same people and normally through a Les Wexner front. And it's from testimony of his staff, body guards, chefs, drivers, pilots, desk girls etc. It's from the positions he was given as a trustee, consultant, board member for organizations where he didn't do any actual work. You can compile and comb through these and corroborate the e

  Globalists Go For Broke: Plan To Trigger World War III Moves Forward By Brandon Smith There are considerable and insidious forces at play when it comes to the development of the war in Ukraine; a swirling mass of think tanks, globalists and bureaucrats are doing everything in their power to instigate an international conflict between the US, the EU and Russia. They’ve specifically been looking for a way to leverage the western populace into supporting direct and open warfare. At the beginning of the event the propaganda was very effective in herding the political left into cheering for NATO involvement, with leftists calling for the “cancellation” of Russia and demanding boots on the ground to “wipe them off the face of the Earth.” One of those rabid activists (Ryan Routh) even tried to assassinate Donald Trump, ostensibly because Trump promised immediate peace negotiations with Russia should he become president again. The Democratic Party, once considered the “anti-war party”, is no

  Why Was This Groundbreaking Study on DEI Silenced? Two leading media organizations abruptly shelved coverage of a groundbreaking study that went against their narrative. Colin Wright In a stunning series of events, two leading media organizations— The New York Times  and Bloomberg—abruptly shelved coverage of a  groundbreaking study  that raises serious concerns about the psychological impacts of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) pedagogy. The  study , conducted by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) in collaboration with Rutgers University, found that certain DEI practices could induce hostility, increase authoritarian tendencies, and foster agreement with extreme rhetoric. With billions of dollars invested annually in these initiatives, the public has a right to know if such programs—heralded as effective moral solutions to bigotry and hate—might instead be fueling the very problems they claim to solve. The decision to withhold coverage raises serious questions abo