Fauci's Fraud And The Covid Cult

Mark Wauck

A recent paper co-authored by none other than “Little Tony” Fauci is gaining some attention (I hasten to add that the moniker “Little Tony” has nothing to do with his net worth):

Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses

David M. Morens

Jeffery K. Taubenberger

Anthony S. Fauci

If you’re guessing that Covid falls within the parameters of the title, you’re absolutely correct. This paper is Fauci’s admission that the injections that were forced on millions to billions of people world wide were administered under false pretenses and were known to be ineffective. It was a big experiment, and it failed. You were the guinea pigs—because they pretty much skipped any animal trials.

Get a load of the Summary:

Viruses that replicate in the human respiratory mucosa without infecting systemically, including influenza A, SARS-CoV-2, endemic coronaviruses, RSV, and many other “common cold” viruses, cause significant mortality and morbidity and are important public health concerns. Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines. In this review, we examine challenges that have impeded development of effective mucosal respiratory vaccines, emphasizing that all of these viruses replicate extremely rapidly in the surface epithelium and are quickly transmitted to other hosts, within a narrow window of time before adaptive immune responses are fully marshaled. We discuss possible approaches to developing next-generation vaccines against these viruses, in consideration of several variables such as vaccine antigen configuration, dose and adjuventation, route and timing of vaccination, vaccine boosting, adjunctive therapies, and options for public health vaccination polices.

This is the programmatic statement of a pseudo-scientific cult, bearing a similar relationship to science as alchemy (many early modern scientists—Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton—were also alchemists). The cult of vaccination as the all purpose remedy for basically all human ills is a bit like the search for the philosopher’s stone. What makes this a cult, rather than a scientific inquiry, is that the cult members—while fully aware that all past injections targeting these broad categories of respiratory viruses have failed to meet the standard to qualify as vaccines—have colluded with Big Pharma to suppress the use of cheap, safe, and effective medications to treat these diseases—multi-purpose drugs such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and supplements such as Vitamin D3, Zinc, and various supporting supplements.

Here’s Alex Berenson providing an intro to his critique of this paper:

Dr. Anthony Fauci now admits the mRNA Covid vaccines hardly work and might not be approvable

In fact, a bombshell paper he co-authored last month suggests ALL vaccines for common respiratory viruses may face intractable hurdles. And that's not even the worst news. I'm not exaggerating.

Last month, three scientists pointed out flu shots barely work and couldn’t be approved based on the standards used for vaccines like measles:

“After more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted… our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.” [emphasis added]

Read this next paragraph slowly. Reread if you need to:

True. Several rigorous papers have proven that flu shots are placebos masquerading as public policy.

Now ask yourself: Is it possible for Big Pharma companies to make fabulous amounts of money—and for the medical establishment to share in the profits—by peddling placebos to a credulous public? Dear reader, I hate to tell you this but, the answer is a resounding: Yes. In an earlier era they might have been called “snake oil.”

And then the authors—including Little Tony—slyly suggest that the mRNA Covid injections are no better than the placebo injections for influenza:

But the same scientists then compared our beloved and groundbreaking Covid vaccines to those pointless flu jabs:

As variant SARS-CoV-2 strains have emerged, deficiencies in these [Covid] vaccines reminiscent of influenza vaccines have become apparent.

And then we get to the cult-like quality of the quest for the magic injection—the authors know that the magic injection may never be found. mRNA was just another failed attempt, leaving a world strewn with human debris. But they’ll keep on trying, at the expense of others:

Yet the Covid/flu shot comparison is only one of the article’s bombshells.

At its core, the piece raises the question of whether any vaccines can ever work well enough to matter against bugs like common coronaviruses, influenza, and RSV.

And that question hides an even more troubling one, one the authors do not ask: have our efforts to beat Sars-Cov-2 by driving our immune response in ways it was not designed to go caused dangers we are only beginning to understand?

But guess what? There has, for years, been evidence that similar dangers of the mRNA injections—spurring the multiplication of variants—has also been found in the influenza placebo injections. This is not some new discovery, as Geerd vanden Bossche and other reputable scientists have been telling the world.

For a more in depth analysis of Little Tony’s confessions, I recommend Karl Denninger’s post today:

Fauci KNEW The Jabs Were Unlikely To Work

Berenson captures the cult-like quality of it all, but KD goes straight for the fraud:

Let's get to the punchline: Fauci had every reason to believe Covid, being a beta coronavirus, could not be controlled by vaccination.  He knew why too; it was not, by any stretch of the imagination, expected to work.  To the contrary he never expected it to work.

As such he knew that that the CDC's and Biden's statements that you won't get Covid if you get vaccinated were almost-certainly false and yet he said nothing.  The CDC knew everything he did so all the CDC's statements were intentionally false and fraudulent.

Let's go through it, because while the other folks who have written on this have made hay about it I want to highlight the actual reasons that he knew, which are laid out in this paper.

Is KD exaggerating? NO, HE IS NOT. Read the article for the details, after which KD writes—and bear in mind: They ARE talking about the mRNA injections:

And the hits just keep coming:

Taking all of these factors into account, it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines. This observation raises a question of fundamental importance: if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so?

Let me translate that: "We knew it almost-certainly would not work so we worked with the manufacturers to game the process so the inevitable failure would be hidden and not doom their sales which, if we ran it to the ground as we should have would have resulted in clinical trial failures and thus no licensure or profits."

If that sounds bad, it just gets worse. KD quotes the article’s admission that scientists don’t actually understand the workings of the human immune system. What, you thought scientists know everything?

But now it gets worse: They admit they don't understand the system in general, yet they claimed to have "the answer":

Nevertheless, the effectiveness of circulating Ig in these situations depends on transudation to mucosal surfaces of very high titers of antibody with specificity for key viral epitopes. It is not fully understood how such transudation is controlled, how antiviral IgA is regulated to function in both passive immunity and immune regulation, or how to elicit and sustain such high antibody levels with vaccination.

Translated: We don't know how the body does this on its own and we don't know how to make it happen through alleged "vaccination" for diseases in this category either.

In other words they went ahead with something they knew they did not understand, yet they claimed it did work -- without evidence.

Oh, and if that's not enough the paper goes on to admit that they knew the jabs likely could not protect the lungs!

Look, none of this is rocket science. Who seriously thinks this article is a revelation of science to the rest of the scientific community, something they never could have guessed? Serious scientists knew all this was a gigantic fraud because it had all been known and taught in universities for a good half century or more. Most of them kept their mouths shut for the sake of their careers and watched as the few honest and brave scientists who spoke up were destroyed. Or, worse, they became cheerleaders for the fraud in order to benefit personally, through media appearances. This is corruption, moral and intellectual, on an almost unimagineable scale.

If you find KD’s prose a bit turgid, read this Daily Caller account, which is comprehensive and quite well written:

‘Scientific And Public Health Failure’: Fauci Admits COVID Shots Didn’t Have A Chance Of Controlling The Pandemic

Can you say: CYA?

The authors conclude that “Past unsuccessful attempts to elicit solid protection” against these viruses is a “scientific and public health failure,” but that they are excited by attempts by researchers to rethink the process “from the ground up” going forward.

The Covid Regime was a gigantic and hugely inhumane—not to mention insanely expensive and destructive—”scientific and public health failure.” But they’re excited to “rethink the process.” It was driven by madmen.

It’s time to just say, No, to these monsters. But it’s also time to demand serious accountability. In so many ways this complete disaster in our public life is a metaphor for the decline of our entire body politic, a careening down the slippery slope of the insane liberal assault on human dignity and human nature.

Source: Meaning In History