They Knew the Media Had the Story Wrong...and Didn't Correct It
They Knew the Media Had the Story Wrong...and Didn't Correct It How a flawed study became a media sensation, and why no one stopped it Lisa Selin Davis Wikimedia /creative commons In February of this year, JAMA Network Open published an article called “Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care” that claimed “receipt of gender-affirming care, including puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormones, was associated with 60% lower odds of moderate or severe depression and 73% lower odds of suicidality over a 12-month follow-up.” TheUniversity of Washington then published a press release repeating the study’s conclusion: “Those who received gender-affirming hormones or puberty blockers had 60% lower odds of depression and 73% lower odds of self-harm or suicidal thoughts.” And then, the media picked it up and ran all the way across the field with it: “Amid Attacks on Care for Trans Youth, New Study Confirms Why It's Life or ...