Nuclear Smoke and Mirrors

 Nuclear Smoke and Mirrors

HANS VOGEL

Just a few days ago, marking the 78th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres ordered his Japanese Under-Secretary General Izumi Nakamitsu to read a statement in his name. Curiously, no mention is made of of the perpetrator, the US. Nor was the US mentioned in Japan during the commemoration of the Hiroshima bombing.

Nevertheless the whole world knows that on 6 August 1945, the crew of the Boeing B-29 Superfortress “Enola Gay” dropped “Little Boy,” the nuclear device that devastated Hiroshima, killing at least 135.000 of its inhabitants. Little Boy fell from his mother’s womb and helped the US win the War in the Pacific (no pun intended). The name of the airplane, Enola Gay, after its commander’s mother, seems chosen with remarkable foresight, since today eight decades after the Second World War, the US is the self-proclaimed champion of gay rights, as well as of those of all other sexual deviancies.

A few days later, on 9 August, a second nuclear bomb was dropped over the city of Nagasaki, razing it like Hiroshima and also killing tens of thousands.

By that time, the Japanese government was willing to concede defeat and sue for peace. Needless to say the US government, generous as it tends to be, acceded to the request and thus the Second World War came to an end. Like Germany (and Austria) and much of continental Europe, Japan was occupied by the US military and forced to accept countless humiliating and less humiliating conditions, change its way of living, its habits, and in general follow the directives of the US government.

Given the fact that since 1945 at least six other nations are known to have acquired nuclear bombs, we must consider ourselves lucky that so far, an all-out nuclear war has not blown up the world. The “Father of the Atom Bomb” was physicist Robert J. Oppenheimer, about whose life a movie was released earlier this summer, earning lavish praise left and right. Together with a number of renowned scientists, Oppenheimer directed the top-secret Manhattan Project, involving tens of thousands of collaborators all over the United States, set up to produce nuclear bombs.

The world outside Hiroshima and Nagasaki, including most of Japan, only knew about the nuclear bombs by hearsay. When the first images of the devastation were published, there were waves of shock and horror. The destructive power of a nuclear bomb is truly terrifying: everything in its path is instantly if not vaporized, at least pulverized.

In this respect, a closer look at the photographs taken immediately after the nuclear bombs detonated leaves one puzzled. Why are so many wooden telephone poles still standing? Whereas most of the houses have burned, the few buildings in brick, stone and concrete are left standing, without apparent structural damage. How was that possible? That taller domed structure is located more or less right underneath the hypocenter, where “Little Boy” exploded.

Actually, there are anomalies everywhere. How come Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not turned into ghost towns, where nuclear radiation was making life impossible for God knows how many years? Were those really nuclear bombs that razed the unfortunate cities?

Russian-born aviation pioneer Alexander P. de Seversky, who was serving in the US Army Air Force as a major, was ordered to report on the damage and visited both Hiroshima and Nagasaki shortly after the end of hostilities. Seversky saw nothing out of the ordinary, nothing that set apart Hiroshima and Nagasaki from other Japanese cities destroyed in conventional bombing raids. He was very clear in the article “Atomic Bomb Hysteria” he published in Reader’s Digest in February, 1946:

“What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.”

Nor could Seversky confirm any indications of increased radioactivity:

“On a vast and horrifying scale it was fire, just fire, that took such high toll of life and property in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The victims did not die instantaneously in a sort of atomic dissolution. They died as people die in any fire. Quite possibly the blast was strong enough to cause internal injuries to many of those caught in the center of explosion; particularly lung injuries – a familiar effect of ordinary high-explosive bombing.

Perhaps there were some deaths from radioactivity. I met people who had heard of casualties from radio burns and radio poisoning. But I could not obtain direct confirmation. The doctors and nurses at the hospitals I visited had no such cases under their care, though some of them had heard of such cases. I also interrogated fire fighters and Red Cross workers who had rushed to the scene in the first few minutes. They all denied personal knowledge of any lingering radioactivity.”

Recently, Michael Palmer, a Canadian physician and microbiologist, has written an exhaustive analysis based on all the available medical documentation on the victims in Hiroshima. His findings are unequivocal: the casualties are due to mustard gas! Palmer concludes that there just isn’t any proof Hiroshima was hit by a “nuclear bomb.” Instead, it was annihilated by a combination of mustard gas and napalm. Hiroshima Revisited, the throughly researched book that Palmer published on the subject, is freely available, so anybody who wishes can enlighten himself on the subject. Next month, a Japanese translation will be published.

Palmer goes on to conclude that the bombings were staged as a means to instill worldwide fear of “nuclear war,” with the ultimate aim of creating a world government. Hungarian-born nuclear physicist Leo Szilard, in his contribution to the NYT bestseller One World or None, edited by Dexter Masters and Katherine Way said so clearly:

“The issue that we have to face is not whether we can create a world government before this century is over. That appears to be very likely. The issue that we have to face is whether we can have such a world government without going through a third world war. What matters is to create at once conditions in which the ultimate establishment of a world government will appear as inevitable to most men as war appears inevitable at present to many.”

Soviet leader Stalin did not fall in that trap and set out to create a “nuclear bomb” for the Soviet Union, which was detonated in 1949. Igor Kurchatov, “Father of the Soviet Atom Bomb,” always alluded to the fact that it was a fake. Having fallen ill in 1945 he grew a beard and publicly vowed to shave it off only after he had managed to create a nuclear bomb and detonate it. He never shaved off the beard.

From a more technical perspective others, such as Anders Björkman, go one further and argue that it is just technically impossible to construct a nuclear bomb, for it requires making a casing that is both strong enough and transportable, to contain the initial phases of a nuclear explosion. In theory, yes, and that is why it has been feasible to unleash underground nuclear explosions, but that is all.

No accident with a “nuclear bomb” has ever resulted in a nuclear explosion. For instance, in 1950, 1958 there have been “non-nuclear detonations of nuclear bombs.” In 1966, a USAF B-52 lost four “hydrogen bombs” over Spain and Spanish waters. “The conventional explosives in two of the bombs detonated upon impact with the ground, dispersing plutonium over nearby farms.” It would seem that Murphy’s Law had been put on hold during every single one of those events. This may actually have been thanks to divine intervention, but it is rather more likely those devices weren’t nuclear bombs.

Given the fact that most politicians in high office, like most CEOs (and most test pilots, incidentally) tend to be psychopaths, it surely is a miracle that nuclear bombs have only ever been used twice. Liz Truss, Britain’s short-lived PM openly said she was ready to use them when necessary. There surely have been enough occasions to do so in the intervening three quarters of a century. Neither Bill Clinton nor George Bush II have had any qualms about using DU (depleted uranium) in the former Yugoslavia or Iraq. These days DU munitions are reported to be delivered for use by the Ukrainian military against their Russian enemies. DU munitions are known to cause all sorts of nasty cancers and the fallout they cause on impact will pollute and poison the area for decades. The fact that in all those years, no one has ever ordered “real” nuclear bombs to be thrown seems convincing proof such weapons do not exist.

So far, the fear of a nuclear war has not brought about a world government, but the WHO and other outfits are still trying to bring it about. The only way they can do that is by fakes, lies and cheap tricks.

Nuclear bombs appear to belong to the same category as the “Moon Landings” Islamic terrorism, the official Covid narratives, anthropogenic global warming, and the official narratives about 9/11 and January 6. All smoke and mirrors.

Source: The Unz Review