America's Jewish Supremacist Problem

MARK WAUCK

Jewish Supremacist control over the US government is leading America down dangerous paths. Yesterday, Doug Macgregor made a strong case that Jewish Supremacist ideology could lead America into a global hot war (edited excerpts from a much longer video; I’ve presented rather full excerpts to give an idea of the scope of Macgregor’s concerns):

On the Edge of Nuclear War? Colonel Douglas Macgregor & Professor Glenn Diesen

I think the ruling class in Europe and in the United States is losing its grip on power. I really do. I think this globalist/neocon class that has opened your borders, admitted tens of millions of people that no one asked for--who cannot be assimilated, who don't want to assimilate who want to essentially settle and conquer you and us, to be blunt--is part of the problem. The electorate, at least in the United States, I think increasingly in Continental Europe, is awakened to this danger and I think they're they're disgusted with it

So, under those circumstances what is the ruling class doing? It ignores reality, it pretends everything is fine, and it launches escapades overseas on the assumption that this will divert attention and distract people. Well this is no distraction with Russia. A war with Russia will not divert attention. It will destroy Europe and we need to understand in the United States that this will touch us as well. We will not escape unscathed and we have nothing really to throw into the fight. We can't even recruit for our armed forces. The Russians look at our Armed Forces populated with women and, you know, men of, I would argue, less than high caliber ... and they laugh.

I think in the United States the focus is increasingly on Israel and you have a situation in Israel which is, I would argue, very desperate. The Israelis are in a very difficult position. They cannot declare victory and end the war because they haven't had any victory. They are caught up in this radical frenzy of murder and expulsion of people from Gaza. They're into it to the point where I think Mr Netanyahu thinks along the following lines:

“First of all, I have control of America. I control the United States. As long as I have control of the United States and the United States is compelled to support me regardless of what I do, I've got to continue. There's no way out of this. Either I utterly defeat all my potential opponents and adversaries in the region and establish my unchallenged strategic dominance, or I risk total failure and potentially collapse.”

Now I know a lot of people look at him and think that he's focused on himself and the charges that he faces. I think people are selling him short. At some point you have to believe what people say--take them at their word. I think Mr Netanyahu--who is a serious, what we would call Jewish supremacist—is bound and determined to establish that once for all because he thinks that's what he owes the Jewish people in the region.

What Macgregor is saying, and has said previously, is that Netanyahu’s policy and goal is to establish Jewish Supremacy throughout the Middle East. He believes he can accomplish that crazy scheme because he controls the United States and can compel the United States to support this endeavor—come hell or high water.

Now you and I can debate the wisdom of that but that's what he believes, and he's surrounded by a lot of people who agree with him. I think most of the population [of Israel] still backs this policy, even though they may dislike him personally. Now that's a dangerous position to take, because at some point the adversaries that you are dealing with--that you regard as weak and incapable--turn out to be capable and they are no longer weak. There is nothing to stop him in Gaza. Let's be frank--there's nothing there. Jordan is a very weak State. [Jordan’s] king, who is normally a very sharp balanced individual, made a terrible mistake when he cast his lot with us, the British, and Israel against Iran. Not against Iran per se but to help defend Israel.

... The Muslim Arab populations in the region are sick to death of the people that rule them--not necessarily because they're corrupt or oppressive, but they see them as weak, as immoral, as utterly failing in their obligations and duties as Muslims to protect the people that the Israelis are slaughtering. So I think in the Emirates, in Saudi Arabia, in Jordan, and I would add Egypt, the leadership in all of these states are very worried. And then you have of course Mr Erdogan. Turkey just went through an election and he didn't do well. People are saying, oh it's the economy. No, the economy in Turkey has been fragile for some time. He's up against a Turkish population that is enraged by what the Israelis are doing and they are very frustrated with his failure to act. To this must be added, obviously, the so-called Shiite Crescent--the Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria as well as in Lebanon and also in Yemen are sort of pop heroes at the moment because they've survived everything thrown at them and they continue to be effective.

Finally, behind this stands Iran and, miraculously, I think Mr Netanyahu looked at the situation and decided taking on Iran while he had not yet finished the job in Gaza was dangerous. He didn't want a multi-front war at that point, so he's tried to narrow the focus to just Gaza, assuming 'if I can get that done then I can turn my guns on Hezbollah and the Americans will have to help me.'

Here I don’t think I can agree with Macgregor. Netanyahu has shown himself willing to do stupid things—such as the current Gaza genocide—so there’s no reason to suppose him unwilling to do stupid things that are also highly dangerous. Such as initiating a war against Hezbollah. Thus far I agree. But initiating a war against Iran would be a bridge way too far, and even Netanyahu figured that out after Iran’s demonstration missile strike. By sending its missiles into the teeth of the best missile defense that the combined capabilities of the US, Israel, and the UK could muster and striking two of Israel’s best defended air bases, Iran sent a clear message to Israel and its Anglosphere proxies: If we can do that, consider what we can do to Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. And US aircraft carriers and regional bases.

So, we shall see. But that's a very dangerous set of circumstances. I know that the USS Eisenhower carrier battle group was on its way home and was turned around and is back in the Red Sea, so that tells me that we're standing by because we anticipate serious problems. ... We're overstretched and undermanned.

We'll see what happens next but none of it looks good anywhere. Everything is at a point now where it could blow up suddenly, and then a large part of our electorate in both Europe and the United States will say, 'What happened? How could this happen?' because they haven't paid attention. They have taken everyone at their word, and there's this very dangerous underlying assumption--war and its devastating consequences is something that happens on other people's soil; it doesn't come to America; doesn't come to Norway; it doesn't even come to Poland. But they might be in for a tough education.

On the domestic front, the exemption of AIPAC from the Foreign Agent Registration Act has allowed Jewish Supremacists to utterly debase our constitutional order, by allowing the Israel Lobby to bring the full force of its financial muscle to bear on Congress. That financial muscle has now been brought to bear on the First Amendment, the cornerstone of American freedoms.

Consider, the US Senate now has a Shomer Yisroel:

My last name is Schumer, which derives from the Hebrew word Shomer, or “guardian.” Of course, my first responsibility is to America and New York. But as the first Jewish Majority Leader of the United States Senate, and the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in America ever, I also feel very keenly my responsibility as Shomer Yisroel — a guardian of the People of Israel.

On the Republican side of the Senate, McConnell, in a seeming twist on the concept of the Shabbos Goy, appears to serve as a Senate Goy:

—the Uniparty has both sides covered on behalf of Jewish Supremacists of the most extreme variety.

In the House we are now being treated to this insanity:

College anti-Israel agitators could be sent to Gaza under new House GOP bill

'I am going to bet that these pro-Hamas supporters wouldn’t last a day, but let’s give them the opportunity,' says Rep Randy Weber

A new House Republican bill would send any person charged and convicted for illegal activity on a college campus to Gaza for at least six months.

Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., introduced the bill on Wednesday alongside Reps. Randy Weber, R-Texas, and Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., in response to the ongoing anti-Israel demonstrations on college campuses across the country.

One presumes that the Israel Lobby approved this absurd bill. Obviously it’s totally unconstitutional, but it’s also a demonstration of Israel Lobby clout and the moral fecklessness of far too many US policitians, who are willing to play the fool in public to garner favor with the Israel Lobby.

In case anyone feels disposed to dispute Macgregor’s term, Jewish Supremacist, here’s an interesting post by Steve Sailer which has to do with the Jewish Supremacist assault on pretty ordinary First Amendment activity in the US. If “Jewish Supremacist” should be a taboo label, why not “Jewish Violence”? Oh, it is.

This issue of Jewish Violence is directly related to my earlier The War Among The Jews. However, violence is, for Jewish Supremacists, an ecumenical affair. They’re perfectly willing to beat up other Jews with whom they disagree, but they don’t stop there. Gentiles are fair game, too—especially because our bought representatives will stand by and allow violent Jews to run riot on college campuses, if the local LE doesn’t respond to Jewish Supremacist demands fast enough.

My hat is off to the many Jews who are speaking out against this lunacy. The increasing willingness of even the MSM to address what’s going on is also encouraging—although these are early days for the defense of our endangered First Amendment freedoms. Endangered by an ethnic supremacist ideology associated with a foreign power.

Jewish Violence at UCLA

UCLA receives the most college admission applications of any college in the United States: 109,000, far ahead of UC Berkeley’s 88,000. It has an impressive campus located between Sunset and Wilshire Boulevards in the heart of the south slope of the Hollywood Hills on the west side of Los Angeles. So, UCLA is a big deal.

I mentioned this earlier, but the evidence continues to pile up that the big brawl on UCLA’s central quad last week was largely started by pro-Israel Israelis and perhaps other Jews: the Jewish version of the Men with Gold Chains whom I talk about a lot in describing the modern San Fernando Valley.

The Western half of Los Angeles, with UCLA at its center, is home to a sizable number of Israelis and other Jews from places like Iran, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus (the ex-Soviets are often part Jewish and part Slav, Armenian, or the like).

However, the term “Jewish violence” is almost off-limits in the press.

From the New York Times news section:

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

…

In The Forward (formerly Jewish Daily Forward), a Jewish UCLA professor wrote an opinion piece blaming pro-Israel Jewish outside agitators for the riot:

I’m a UCLA professor. Why didn’t the administration stop last night’s egregious violence?

…

Okay, so the UCLA riot appears to be a good example of Jewish violence. But I haven’t seen anybody in the press use the term “Jewish violence.”

Follow the link to Sailer’s post for the full text.

Source: Meaning In History