"Counting Votes to Decide Everything"
"Counting Votes to Decide Everything"
Zionist Zealotry and the Ballot Box. Which Zionist Political Party Will You Pick?
Many dozens of elections throughout the world are taking place during 2024. Not surprisingly, the most widely and closely watched of these electoral rituals is the US presidential contest. In 2023 the The Economist ominously predicted that in the forthcoming year of mass voting, “Donald Trump Poses the Biggest Danger to the World.”
In this essay I shall highlight the elections in the USA, the UK, and Canada. These three cases as well as many others revolve around growing factionalism within Zionism and within the larger Jewish community based inside and outside Israel.
These antagonisms figure prominently among the growing tensions generated by the genocidal assault in Gaza and the West Bank. The intensity and duration of this onslaught to advance the longstanding quest to de-Palestinianize Israel, is helping to inflame a larger conflagration in the Middle East and Eurasia including Ukraine.
The option of war and peace are, for the most part, not signified on election ballots. However the political proponents for war are many. They are generally well funded and well advertised to the public. They tend to dominate positions of high influence in a variety of entrenched political parties. With great frequency, proponents of war vastly outnumber candidates whose main platform is to promote peace.
During this year of elections, much of humanity is becoming increasingly shrouded amidst the fog of war. Truth is the first casualty of wartime propaganda which is designed to cripple our capacities for accurate perception and sound reasoning. In our current subordination beneath ascending and refurbished transnational plutocracies, most citizens are being systematically herded into new types of constraints surrounding digitalized holding pens.
The dissemination of wall-to-wall propaganda deprives many of the crucial understanding that we all are targets of depopulation. The survivors of this reduction in the global population are slated for captivity and enslavement in AI laboratories of robotic transhumanism.
As military, financial, medical, and logistical catastrophes mount, those seeking to emerge as triumphant show their contempt for us by playing fast and loose with our lives and with the prospects of our descendants who are already slated for mandatory genetic modification.
Elections in the Rise and Fall of Democracy
This year there are probably more voters casting ballots than ever before in any twelve-month period in history. For many people on earth, the franchise— the embodiment of the right and responsibility to vote in local and national elections— is still relatively new to them. The new voters include many millions of recently-enfranchised women from parts of the Islamic world.
At first glance the recent expansion of the franchise seems auspicious for the future of democracy. A preponderance of honest elections signify that governors have obtained a measure of informed consent from the governed. In the late 1600s Englishman John Locke famously identified freely-given consent as the primary condition underlying the legitimacy of citizens’ representation in democratic systems.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/7370/7370-h/7370-h.htm
While the act of voting is often seen as proof that democracy is underway, this perception in not always valid. Currently many malevolent forces are robbing some elections of their quality and integrity. In some cases elections can be empty rituals done more for show rather than for advancing processes for planning and realizing positive political change.
Oftentimes those with the lion’s share of political influence and wealth exploit their entrenched advantages to rig elections as well as electoral systems in order to further empower themselves. They sometimes use elections to aggrandize their own authorities at the expense of those outside the charmed inner circle of wealth and political influence.
More and more the privileged classes exercise disproportionate control over who gets funded in elections as well as what people and issues get highlighted or ignored in the big leagues of media coverage. Especially snarly, unpredictable is this present season of simultaneous elections set in so many varied jurisdictions and cultures.
The biggest issue in the world right now is that Israel and the United States are deeply engaged in committing genocide aimed at eliminating Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank. And this genocide is clearly being planned as the opening act of more to come for everybody outside Occupied Palestine, everybody outside Israel.
So far almost 200,000 Palestinians, largely women and children, have been exterminated even as further hundreds of thousands have been injured.
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2545961/middle-east
Throughout much of the world Big Tech is at the heart of media censorship, calculated disinformation, and diversionary sensationalism. These polluting injections into public discourse sabotage the conditions necessary for the successful exercise of democracy.
A big part of this assault on democracy revolves around the failure of most media operations to report on the biggest news story of our times. This story has to do with the persistent failure of media outlets to cover their own roles in actively causing some major events to happen. At the same time these outlets relegate other events not of their own making to invisibility and obscurity outside the camera’s viewfinder.
The news media are often instrumental in changing the course of history rather than simply observing unfolding events from positions of neutral observation on the sidelines. Not only are the news media prone to ignore their role in making history but their agents are often negligent in explaining their own motivations and incentives for intervening as they do. What’s in it for them?
In recent times media negligence extends to withholding necessary understanding from the public even of life-and-death issues. The media appointed itself arbiter of whether or not to take COVID injections. These bioweapons proved to be far more lethal and injurious than even some of the most outspoken skeptics predicted. The array of new illnesses derived from the jab including harmed
The aim is often to point us away from a developed sense of our own individual and class interests. The aim is to shape our perceptions, attitudes and behaviours not to serve our own needs but rather to conform with the agendas of those seeking to benefit from our demise.
A dominant theme in the disinformation is meant to advance the psychology of war mongering while pretending that the option of peace is unavailable or unworthy of popular embrace. The promotion of war mongering often involves the dehumanization and demonization of designated enemies.
The other side of this same equation is the lionization of those that promising to vanquish individuals and groups stigmatized by weaponized language including vague and purposely ill-defined terms like hate speech, terrorism, White supremacism, and Anti-Semitism.
While the media has a major role in setting the mental and cultural context of elections, electoral procedures can be the subject of many forms of malicious manipulation. Many poisons can be injected into electoral procedures to taint their outcomes. As Joseph Stalin is said to have observed, “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”
The rigging of elections throughout the world is a vast and complex subject. There are many methods that can be utilized to deny elected office to candidates who actually won the right and responsibility to represent citizens in legislative bodies.
Certainly computerized voting has shown itself across many different settings over several decades now to provide wide latitude for various types of electoral cheating. The use of paper ballots constitutes an easy and obvious corrective to counter the malicious manipulation of digital data as a common tactic in election fraud.
In 2008 in Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, Prof. Mark Crispin Miller introduced his sharp and sustained focus on the topic of vote rigging in the United States. The United States has long advertised itself to the world as the quintessential home and embodiment of democracy. Nevertheless election rigging in the USA has proven itself to be stubbornly impervious to positive reforms such as those proposed by Prof. Miller and others for enacting the conditions of honest elections.
Case 1
Almost Assassinated in America
Especially with all the special Covidian arrangements for mail-in ballots, the presidential election in late 2020 was shown to those who investigated the subject, including me, to be rife with abundant proofs that election frauds of many kinds had taken place.
https://www.unz.com/article/trumps-landslide-meets-the-politics-of-electoral-fraud-in-america/
The harsh response in 2020 to any and all indications that the US presidential election had been rigged in Joe Biden’s favour, helped demonstrate the immense clout of the Big Tech communications cartels both domestically and globally. This same bias was consistent with the main thrust of the Covidian lies, mandates, and other restrictions brought to fruition during the ongoing term of the Biden presidency.
Following precedents ushered in with the WHO-declared pandemic, the well-orchestrated media conglomerates prohibited and discredited any serious investigation, or even discussion, of election fraud. Similarly, by declaring Hunter Biden’s Laptop from Hell to be an expression of Russian propaganda, the FBI joined in the Legacy media’s rigging of the “news” environment in overtly censorious ways calculated to favour the election of the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate.
Many authorities adhered to the media message to whitewash the Biden crime family including by pointing public attention away from the complicity of its top patriarchal figure in election fraud.
The sudden appearance and instant counting of great masses of mail-in ballots in the early morning hours following election day on 3 November, 2019, aroused alarms that very quickly translated into many trajectories of serious investigative research. Widespread distrust of public institutions was the result. This distrust has never been satisfactorily resolved to this day.
When people retired for bed on November 3 all indications pointed to the conclusion that Donald Trump had won. When people woke up the next day, everything had changed. Very soon the media was commandeered to consistently refer to Biden as the “President Elect.”
As usual, in 2020 the courts followed the lead of the big media venues maintaining a longstanding tradition of avoiding any serious reckoning with allegations of election rigging. Right up to the summer of 2024, very little has been done by the national or state governments to overhaul the systemic problems that made for the many-faceted contentiousness that broke out in the course of the problematic counting of the vote in 2020.
Will the presidential election underway end up in a similar train wreck of criminal charges and convictions derived from well-documented allegations of electoral fraud in 2020? Recall that unaddressed apprehension of election fraud were integral to the 6 January fiasco at the Capital. Are the conditions once again being established with the potential to transform another contested national election into what might become, this time around, a full-fledged civil war?
The political rally featuring the presentation of Donald Trump at a venue in Butler Pennsylvania became the site of an “attempted assassination” that has emerged as a defining moment in the Biden-Trump phase of the US presidential election.
Some of the responses to the debacle of July 13 seem to indicate that a coronation took place when Donald Trump walked away with an ear said to be grazed by a bullet reported to have wizzed by the head of the former US President. “Fight fight fight,” Trump proclaimed punching the air with a raised fist.
The details of the episode immediately became the subject of much speculation as well as probing analysis on social media. Among the core mysteries of the saga was whether the Secret Service under Alejandro Mayorkas’ Homeland Security Agency was merely incompetent or whether the American SS let the episode happen as part an inside job.
How was it that the supposed shooter was able to set himself up on the elevated platform from whence, it is said, he fired the bullet that almost killed Trump?
Under normal circumstances Joe Biden would have to be considered a suspect in the attempted murder case given his comments just days before the gun shot that, we have been told, almost killed Trump. Biden explained to a group of Democratic Party donors that
“I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump. I’m absolutely certain I’m the best person to be able to do that. So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
What are the implications of President Biden going on the record saying such a thing? What is to be made of the fact that high-ranking officials in the Biden administration are involved in an episode that quite literally put Donald Trump in a real “bullseye” in the course of what seems to have been a genuine assassination attempt?
Shouldn’t this unusual way of describing a political opponent make Biden a suspect in a high-profile case of attempted murder? Doesn’t this alignment of circumstances create a delicate problem for the law enforcement officials including Marrick Garland. Garland and Mayorkas are high up in the large contingent of Zionist Jews that dominate the key parts of the executive branch of the US government.
Biden made perfunctory comments about his abhorrence to violence, a dubious remark from an individual most responsible for delivering the weaponry for a notorious genocide now under investigation by the UN’s highest judicial agencies. The hypocrisy and double standards of Biden in trying to characterize himself as an opponent of violent speech is addressed here.
The outcome of the Butler episode seems to have provided a means of putting off some of the scandals and infamy that was about to blacken the reputations of many public officials and institutions. The drama of what appears to be Trump’s near-death episode in Butler, seems to have provided a backdrop for the resuscitation of strategic illusions enabling a mythological return to the American Dream and its myths of democratic idealism.
About three weeks prior to the Butler shooting, the rematch between Trump and Biden took a dramatic turn in the course of a televised debate hosted by CNN. During interludes in the debate, Joe Biden lost his ability to construct coherent sentences conveying logical and consistent narratives. He often seemed lost in his own state of fear, confusion and disorientation.
The spectacle of a US President showing clear signs of dementia to an audience of tens of millions of people immediately raised many red flags. Quickly a national discussion took form in which some alleged that Biden’s perceptual and linguistic liabilities are nothing new; that they had long been concealed from the public to serve the interests of a covert and unaccountable few.
Immediately strident calls came from prominent Democrats, and especially the billionaire donor class. The messages insisted that Biden must withdraw from the presidency to be replaced by another candidate capable of beating Trump. The episode drew unwanted scrutiny from many figures who condemned the top people in the Democratic Party for hiding the severity of Biden’s dementia.
Public discussion continued. If Biden was so incapable of sustained rationality in a debating format, who really was making the key decisions put out in the name of the aging US President? The questioning put a highlight on the role of Barack Obama, the former US President who was instrumental in making Biden his V-P and then in guiding his obedient puppet into the job of President.
In responding to all of this, Joe Biden with the backing of his wife Jill and of his son Hunter, made in clear that he had no intention of withdrawing from the presidency and from his re-election campaign.
Trump and Netanyahu Leave Biden in the Dust
In the genesis of this electoral contest between Biden and Trump, the contentions among anti- and pro-Zionist Jews are playing an oversized role. The importance of Christian Zionists in the pro-Israel movement adds to the tumult.
It is becoming increasingly clear that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would much prefer to have Donald Trump over Joe Biden as his primary military ally in the martial showdown developing in the Middle East and Eurasia.
Notwithstanding all the animosity he stirs up among many Israeli Jews, Netanyahu is of course something of a kingpin with much influence especially in high-level political circles in the United States where the current Israeli PM grew up. Among Israeli Jews, Trump has been groomed by the Casino magnates, Sheldon and Miriam Adelson.
In his first term as US President, Sheldon helped fund Trump’s campaign in return for his moving the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Now with Sheldon gone, Miriam is supplying $100 million to Trump’s campaign on the understanding that as US President, the Republican Party leader will arrange for Israel’s full-fledged annexation of the West Bank.
Here we are seeing yet another example of the strange politics that have repeatedly made Palestine a plot of land whose legal status can be altered by the leadership of the Anglo-American Empire for a price without any involvement, let alone agreement of, the native Palestinians.
Donald Trump states openly that the United States should help Israel “finish the job” when it comes to de-Palestinianization of Israel through genocide and forced deportation.
It seems likely that the agenda being hatched in and around the Trump-Netanyhu axis extends to a joint assault on the Axis of Resistance including on Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, the Shia militias in Iraq and Syria and, of course Iran.
The lust to culminate the elimination of Palestinians with a massive US-backed invasion of Iran has been at the top of the neocon wish list since well before 9/11.
The Democratic Party, it seems, is about to be defeated by the Republican Party who are joining the most Jewish supremacist political coalition ever to govern Israel. Iran in its present form sets limits on Israel’s desire to dominate the West Asia.
Who can say how Trump’s apparent survival of an assassination attempt with the fingerprints of America’s Homeland Security agency all over it, figures into the important political realignments underway.
The perception created, however, is that Trump has left Biden in the dust as the current US President was forced back home to recover from another bout of “COVID-19.” Biden did so just as Donald Trump accepted the nomination of a united and rejuvenated Republican Party.
Quite likely Biden’s sometimes demented confusion was instrumental in enabling Netanyahu to continue pressing the peddle to the metal in Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza and the West Bank In retrospect Joe Biden’s confusion was probably a factor in his inability to obtain some significant concessions from Netanyahu in order to assuage some of the pro-Palestinian lobbying from liberal factions within the Democratic Party.
Some of those factions called for a decisive end to the genocide or, at the very least, a cease fire allowing some Palestinians to gain access to humanitarian aid. This political process within the Democratic Party forms a major part of the reconfiguration of Jews, some of whom are in the process of rejecting the Zionist legacy that so far has been synonymous with the origins, consolidation and culture of Israel.
The changing patterns of alliances and schisms among Jews is integral to a larger process that has put in the forefront the dubious legitimacy of Western governments that have made the embrace of Zionism the key requirement for leadership positions in both governing and opposition parties.
CASE 2
Grovelling for Zionist Approval in the UK Election of 2024
The national election in Great Britain took place on the 4th of July. The Labour Party won a majority of seats in the British House of Commons resulting in Keir Starmer becoming the new Prime Minister. In taking control of the Labour Party in 2020, Starmer banished its prior leader, Jeremy Corbyn, from membership.
Between 2015 and 2019 Corbyn worked hard to overcome the legacy of “New Labour” left by Tony Blair. As Gilad Atzmon put it in 2015 when Corbyn took over the leadership of the Labour Party
“Corbyn seems to re-unite the Brits. He cares for the weak. He opposes interventionist wars. He represents the return of the good old left as opposed to New Labour’s affinity with big money, choseness and exceptionalism…. But as Britain sees the rise of a hugely popular ideological movement, many Jewish institutions see Corbyn as an arch enemy. They would prefer to see him gone and have used nearly every trick in the book to discredit him.”
https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2015/08/18/jeremy-corbyn-and-the-jews/
As soon as Corbyn became the Labour Party leader, the Israel Lobby in Great Britain set its sights on destroying Corbyn’s political career. The Labour Party became a den of intrigue as the Israel Lobby infiltrated many of its core institutions and officials. As described in a 860 page Labour Party Report, Corbyn’s internal enemies were given major incentives to make it appear that the party’s leader was an anti-Semite who should not have a place in the upper echelons of influence in the British parliamentary system.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/how-top-labour-officials-plotted-bring-down-corbyn
Recorded three years before the current genocidal onslaught, the following video presents a snapshot of the kind of positions that Corbyn advocates. Corbyn asserted that the substance of international law must be asserted and enforced to bring to an end the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.
In the course of the recent election in Great Britain the Labour Party gained over 400 seats but with a smaller cumulative vote than it received in the prior votes. Starmer experienced the same diminishment of votes in his own riding. Generally speaking, the major parties, Labour and the Conservatives, stuck together embracing the same policies of unconditional support for the government of Israel and its US partners
This shared position was papered over with the decontextualized assertion that “Israel has a right to defend itself.” Those that press this position almost never address the the right and the pressing need of native Palestinians to defend themselves from the genocidal incursions of the Occupying power.
Large masses of British citizens of many backgrounds demonstrated in many large rallies putting on public display the wide extent of popular opposition to the onslaughts of mass murders directed at the native inhabitants of Gaza and the West Bank.
The naysayers to genocide succeeded in electing into Parliament five independent MPs who defied the common front maintained by the old guard Israeliphiles who showed themselves to be willing to look the other way in the face of genocide. One of the successful independents was Jeremy Corbyn. After representing his home constituency in North London for more than 40 years, Corbyn received 24,120 votes defeating Labour’s Praful Nargund with 16,873 votes.
In commenting on his defeat of his Labour Party opponent, Corbyn indicated that those who voted for him were “looking for a government that on the world stage will search for peace, not war, and not allow the terrible conditions to go on in Gaza at the present time.”
https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/500729/Pro-Palestine-candidates-secure-wins-in-UK-election
https://www.unz.com/article/electoral-secession-and-the-end-of-imperial-britain/
Corbyn is typical of many prophetic figures in the Western World who went against the grain of those dominating the executive offices of media, government and business. Those who observed that something was very wrong in the conduct of Israeli-Palestinian relations can now point out that they were correct in anticipating where this accelerating atrocity was headed.
From Imperial Rule to Imperial Subjugation
What is to be made of the coming to power of the Labour Party in the fragile conditions of these times, when observant people have sound reason to question if the rule of law even exists any longer. This question raises especially pertinent issues in a country that is the home of the English language, that is the site of the “Mother of All Parliaments” and that was the metropolis of the most far-reaching and elaborate imperial system the world has ever seen.
The British Empire lives on in the continuation of its monarchy and in the ongoing financial prominence of the City of London along with its worldwide network of tax havens and money laundering hot spots. Otherwise it is very clear Great Britain has come down fast and hard in the hierarchy of global powers.
Great Britain’s present position of subordination is unfolding within the primary network of Zionist-dominated governments. The centre of gravity of this network seems presently to be in Israel and also in the declining but nevertheless formidable power of the global operations integral to the US military apparatus.
Great Britain is definitely the weakest party in the Anglo-American Empire whose imperial prowess was instrumental in the founding and growth of Greater Israel whose expansionary zeal is presently on worldwide public display.
It was far from inevitable that the imperial authority of Great Britain would vanish so quickly and dramatically from geopolitical prominence. The National Socialist Workers’ Party of Germany led by Adolf Hitler was for a time closely aligned with many elements of the ruling class in Great Britain. Together both sides explored a possible alliance as an alternative to what became World War II.
The option of an alliance was raised to the highest level of statecraft especially in 1940 when the peace proponents in the British cabinet were well represented by Lord Halifax who could well have become the British Prime Minister.
Churchill’s biographer, David Irving, who was once an extremely popular, best-selling author in Britain, draws prolifically on many original primary sources to make his case. As Paul Craig Roberts explains it,
“David Irving is undoubtedly the best historian of World War II. For decades he relentlessly searched for and found diaries of the main figures, pried loose official documents, tracked down witnesses, searched the war archives of many countries, all of which is the material of his extraordinary histories.
The facts differed from the official narratives. Jews took umbrage and ruined him financially, forcing his publisher to destroy their printings of his histories, which were best-sellers praised by other historians, and by bringing corrupt law suits against which he had to defend, which exhausted his financial resources.”
In Irving’s account, Churchill was in constant need of money to finance his luxurious and alcoholic lifestyle. His sponsors paid him well to promote war with Germany. When he finally got his way, he became a proponent of vicious bombing campaigns aimed mostly at civilians. This assault culminated in the notorious fire bombing of Dresden.
Where would Britain be right now if its leadership had sided with Germany? What would have transpired if a British-German alliance had prevailed thereby cancelling out the post-war upsurge of a so-called Cold War structured on a somewhat contrived rivalry between the USA and the Soviet Union.
This bipolar alignment helped drive a very lucrative arm’s race. The rivalry situated the newly-created polity of Israel along with many Jewish financiers in the influential geostrategic position they presently occupy notwithstanding the current disruptions.
Israel lies at the nexus of the Zionist leadership of all the Western powers whose governors essentially grovel to back up agents of the Jewish state as they struggle to deal with their shift from being victims to being purveyors of genocide.
Part of the grovelling on the part of the UK government was on open display in the 4th of July election. Part of this grovelling involved an intervention by the leadership of the UK Conservative Party aimed at persuading the judges of the UN’s International Criminal Court to put aside charges against Benjamin Netanyahu, Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders. The British request created complications concerning the ICC’s jurisdiction over the war crimes of Israelis in Gaza.
Apparently Keir Starmer made a move to withdraw the intervention of his Conservative Party predecessors although the US government is getting involved on the side of those seeking to block the criminal proceedings.
CASE 3
Both Governing Party and the Main Opposition Party in Canada’s Parliament Proclaim, “Israel First.”
The next national election in Canada will probably be in 2025. Theoretically the Canadian election could come anytime because the Liberal Party government led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau does not command a majority of seats in the House of Commons.
The rule in Canada is that a federal election must be called once the governing party or coalition fails to retain the confidence of the House. Such a breakdown of confidence is demonstrated by losing a vote in the House of Commons. Presently the New Democratic Party of Canada has agreed to vote consistently with the Trudeau Liberals until sometime in 2025.
The Conservative Party of Canada is led by Pierre Poilievre. Poilievre is presently Leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition Party in Canada’s Parliament. In Canada as in many other Western countries, the rule of Israel First Zionism prevails on both sides of the aisle. As in the United States and Great Britain, for instance, it is presently virtually impossible for the governing party to obtain its position without the approval of the dominant Israel Lobby.
In Canada an organization known as the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, CIJA, plays a role similar to that of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, in the USA. Both CIJA and AIPAC are at the nexus of a very elaborate array of Jewish Zionist organizations that together exercise enormous influence largely through the leverage gained by media dominance, formidable intimidation, and purchased political influence.
Justin Trudeau rose to power in close company with Stephen Bronfman, part of the legendary Canadian family of Jewish bootleggers who founded the Seagram Liquor Company.
As outlined below, it seems that Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre is edging out Trudeau in terms of his popularity with the Israel Lobby in Canada.
As explained in The Maple linked to below, it seems that Poilievre is following in the footsteps of Stephen Harper. Harper is a former Canadian PM who developed extremely deep and extensive ties as a Zionist agent for the government of Israel. Harper maintains this many-faceted commitment to serve Israel to this day to that this day.
In The Maple, based in Ontario Canada
https://www.readthemaple.com/no-better-friend-pierre-poilievres-war-on-palestine-solidarity/
Pierre Poilievre was invited to speak in a Toronto synagogue where he made a major presentation on 7 April, 2024 at 10:32 AM. With many detailed characterizations, the yarmulke-wearing Conservative Opposition Leader explains much in this video.
Poilievre grew up in Alberta. Poilievre explains to a Jewish Congregation in Toronto many aspects of his heavily pro-Israel, sneeringly anti-Palestinian polices. Poilievre is taking sides in radical ways that will make Canada even more complicit in genocide in Gaza and the West Bank than it already is.
Click Here to the Link. Then click on to the video.
Given the way he sees the Israel-Palestinian conflict, one can easily imagine that as a future prime minister of Canada, Pierre Poilievre would have no trouble in joining with Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump in seeking to bring down Hezbollah, the Houtis and Iran.
Comments
Post a Comment