What Do I Think About Ivermectin and HCQ?

 Something to think about...



What Do I Think About Ivermectin and HCQ?



Part of the Op, sorry to say


Jessica Hockett

A friend sent me this article about Ivermectin for my reaction.

Agent131711’s Substack
The Players Behind IVERMECTIN: How the World Became Convinced to Eat Insecticide
In May of 2024, I published an article called Ivermectin: Population Control Poison. In that piece, we looked at what exactly Ivermectin is and a brief history of how it came to be. Long story short: people in Africa who lived near certain bodies of water suddenly began developing symptoms; rash, skin discoloration and sometimes losing their eyesight…
Read more
14 days ago · 253 likes · 219 comments · Agent131711

It’s an interesting read with intriguing details that demonstrates (yet again) how Drug Lords & their Funders are forever in search of for-profit purposes their drugs can serve.


When it comes to Ivermectin and other “early treatment” drugs for COVID-19, my position is more straightforward and sidesteps the efficacy question altogether:


  1. There was no new disease or cause of death caused by a novel coronavirus that came on the scene in late 2019/early 2020. The WHO lied when it created Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

  2. Because there was no new disease and nothing unique about the associated symptoms - no new repurposed treatments were needed.

  3. Hydroxycholoquine and Ivermectin were part of the government’s dual-sided Op/Counter-Op in a staged pandemic. Besides profit, the utility of these drugs is in preserving the “new novel spreading virus and new disease” narrative.

  4. As far as I know there have been no Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving either drug versus chicken noodle soup, a warm blanket, and hug (as 

    Dr Mike Yeadon
     has recommended) - or any of the remedies offered by post-war Brits in this 1959 video.

  5. Any “treatment” that spares someone testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 from being admitted to the hospital and subjected to a euthanasia protocol or neglect is going to perform pretty well in a study.

  6. The largely test-dependent COVID case definition means that patients in IVM and HCQ studies could have any number of symptoms or conditions for which the drugs are beneficial (or at least not harmful).

“But Ivermectin/HCQ really worked for me and my grandma!” someone might say.


Okay. So it didn’t make worse whatever unremarkable illness you & grandma had, and possibly spared you from things which might have made it much worse. That’s neither proof a novel disease or the efficacy of the drug.1


Maybe you’re thinking, “But HCQ was suppressed!”


The “battle” over the drug was a highly politicized affair involving circus-like Pro/Con factions.2 What better way is there to create demand for a product, and direct questions away from whether a new deadly pathogen is suddenly spreading, than to have one group saying a drug works for the disease it allegedly causes and another, bigger and louder group saying it doesn’t? Peter McCullough versus Anthony Fauci, covered by The Wall Street Journal in April 2020 is illustrative:

Wood House 76
Peter McCullough Is a Pandemicist AND an Example of What the Dual-Sided Government Operation Wanted Americans to Hear in 2020
I agree with Jonathan Engler that Peter McCullough is a “Next Pandemicist…
Read more
7 months ago · 74 likes · 62 comments · Jessica Hockett

It’s easier to see in retrospect that Early Treatment was implicitly presented as an alternative to Hospitalize & Oxygenate or Sedate/Ventilate, without directly challenging the idea that a new disease was going to send a good number of people to the ICU who needed to be intubated.


James Todaro and two colleagues, for example, were very quick with a Chloroquine paper the same day the U.S. declared a National Emergency. Saying things like “it might slow the pandemic” and “give extra time to develop a vaccine” affirmed the WHO’s claims and the federal government’s embrace thereof. There’s no anti-establishment stance here.




Agent131711 is correct that Ivermectin was planted early as well. Later in 2020 and into 2021+ the drug was thrust more prominently into the Early Treatment spotlight with help from Pierre Kory, Senator Ron Johnson, Joe Rogan, and others, as The Pandemic War moved into different theaters and phases.

The idea that the government & vaccine developers would try to keep repurposed drugs or mundane remedies from the public during a Deadly Pandemic Event is not only a predictable storyline but also straight out of the movie Contagion. I tip my hat to the agencies that pulled it off in real life using a range of unwitting and witting players.


They prevented much of the populace from questioning the pandemic - and saved some chickens too.


1

Personal experience isn’t a great test for novelty to humankind: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-sickest-ive-ever-been

2

Some of the “Pro” faction in summer 2020: https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1778088729740988424



Source: Wood House 76

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Next Step for the World Economic Forum

Image
The Next Step for the World Economic Forum BY  ROGER KOOPS      FEBRUARY 20, 2022 I t has been obvious since early 2020 that there has been an organized cult outreach that has permeated the world as a whole. It’s possible that this formed out of a gigantic error, rooted in a sudden ignorance of cell biology and long experience of public health. It is also possible that a seasonal respiratory virus was deployed by some people as an opportunity to seize power for some other purpose.  Follow the money and influence trails and the latter conclusion is hard to dismiss.  The clues were there early. Even before the WHO declared a pandemic in March 2020 (at least several months behind the actual fact of a pandemic) and before any lockdowns, there were media blitzes talking about the “New Normal” and talk of the “Great Reset” (which was rebranded as “Build Back Better”).  Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Astra-Zene...
Read more

What the Media Is HIDING About Ukraine/Russia

Image
Thanks to CoCoLuv9491 for recommending this video... What the Media Is HIDING About Ukraine/Russia While the mainstream US media chant with one voice for war and to place full responsibility for the Ukraine crisis on Russia, a cursory investigation of NATO’s meddling in Ukraine’s affairs for more than a decade reveals how economic interests of weapons manufacturers and the fossil fuel industry have led to the military conflict we’re experiencing today. Jimmy and The Grayzone’s Aaron Maté ( https://mate.substack.com ) discuss western and NATO complicity in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Source: The Jimmy Dore Show
Read more

The State of Emergency, Coercive Medicine, and Academia

Image
The State of Emergency, Coercive Medicine, and Academia by   Maximilian C. Forte "Two weeks to flatten the curve,” is what we heard across Canada 1  just after March 11, 2020, when the World Health Organization unilaterally declared a global “pandemic” according to new criteria developed in 2009 that emphasized transmissibility over lethality. 2  We are now approaching two years of a crisis that is routinely and deceptively blamed on “Covid”. Politicians, public health officials, and the mass media have made persistent pronouncements that tended towards the inflation of grim numbers and the exaggeration of threats. 3 The State of Emergency and its Consequences Building on expanded threat perception, authorities have deliberately promoted fear, induced panic, and created stress. 4  With the public suffering an epidemic of fear bordering on mass psychosis, 5  states have multiplied and escalated the number and types of restrictions, few of which have the supp...
Read more