Al CIA-da Mission Accomplished!

As the establishment media has been eager to remind you, this weekend marked the 25th anniversary of the tragic events of September 11, 2001, the horrific act of brutality committed by those dastardly Al Qaeda terrorists. #NeverForget

But, as the US government has just informed us, Al Qaeda are actually totally cool (at least in Syria), so why are you upset about Uncle Sam lifting a few sanctions on them, you obsessed weirdos, you?!

Yes, if you were Normie Q. Normieson and you swallowed the Al Qaeda lie as every patriotic, tax-paying, government-trusting citizen has done for a quarter of a century, you might be tempted to cynically observe that this is Al Qaeda’s “mission accomplished” moment. After all, they pulled off 9/11, caused havoc in Afghanistan and Iraq, menaced the world for decades, and now they’re being normalized and rehabilitated on the international stage.

“Don’t you see?” says Normie, frothing at the mouth and gesturing frantically at hijab-wearing governors and 9/11 pens. “Al Qaeda won!”

As you might suspect, however, I have a slightly different take...

THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY...?

As you’ll know from the most recent episode of New World Next Week, the latest twist in the highly unlikely tale of the Al Qaeda bogeymen is the Trump administration’s recent decision to remove the al-Nusrah Front, aka “Al Qaeda in Syria,” from the US Treasury’s Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) organization list.

The decision comes as part of the US government’s overall program to tie up the loose ends left by its decades-long regime change operation in Syria. That program has culminated in Uncle Sam removing Syria from its list of officially designated State Sponsors of Terrorism.

To put that in plain English: when Syria was ruled as a secular state by the London-trained ophthalmologist Bashar al-Assad...

...it was a State Sponsor of Terrorism.

But now that Syria has been taken over by the literal child-beheaders and heart-eaters of the US-backed Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist insurgents who tore that country to pieces...

...it’s a US-approved legitimate nation state!

The Grayzone notes in their article on the move that the US Treasury has just lifted sanctions on Abdullah Muhaysini, a “Salafi-jihadi cleric from Saudi Arabia who participated in videotaped massacres of captive soldiers and recruited droves of foreign youth to carry out suicide bombings throughout Syria over the past decade,” on “Abu Sulayman al-Muhajir, a top Al Qaeda recruiter in Australia who fled to Syria; Shafi Sultan Mohammed al-Ajmi, a major Kuwaiti financier of Al-Nusra; and Abdul Samrez Jashari, an Albanian foreign fighter who has taken on a senior role in Syria’s military under Al-Sharaa.”

For the hard of thinking, it needs to be stressed that no one is praising Bashar al-Assad or the prior Syrian government as some exemplar of virtue and beneficence. No, Syria under Assad was not a pleasant place. That’s precisely why the Bush administration used Syria in the first half of its War of Terror as a destination for its “extraordinary rendition” program. Remember Robert Baer’s quip: “If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria. If you want someone to disappear—never to see them again—you send them to Egypt.”

The transition from Syria under Assad to Syria under Al Qaeda comes is the completion of the US and Israeli-backed, decades-long plan to topple the Syrian government by funding the “opposition” in the country...who just happened to be Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists hellbent on turning the country into a Muslim Caliphate.

Viewers of the 8th Annual Fake News Awards will recall that the plan came to fruition when an Al Qaeda-linked terrorist known as “Abu Mohammed al-Jolani”...

...trimmed his beard, donned a suit and became Ahmed al-Sharaa, President of Syria.

The average Westerner, going about their life and not paying much attention to the news, might not have given this strange presidential transition in Syria a second thought.

Those with slightly higher acumen may be scratching their heads in befuddlement. “Wait, weren’t Al Qaeda the bad guys a few years ago? What’s going on?”

Then there are my dear readers, who, being the fully awake, switched-on sort, will know that this incredible transition we’re seeing from Al Qaeda The Epitome of All Evil to Al Qaeda The Band of Respectable Statesmen is actually perfectly predictable.

ALWAYS AT WAR WITH EURASIA...

Indeed, anyone who has been observing the evolving story of Al Qaeda is aware of all the twists and turns that have led us to this bizarre moment in history.

You’ll remember, for example, how the Al Qaeda bogeyman was introduced to credulous TV-watching Americans in 1997 by Peter Arnett in his “exclusive first television interview of Osama bin Laden!”

And you’ll recall John Miller’s 1998 interview of OBL, which aired in June 1998, just two months before the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.

And of course you’ll recollect that every television network in America and seemingly every television station in the world began their non-stop coverage of Osama bin Laden and his band of fearsome jihadis in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

It may be difficult for those who were not alive at the time to understand, but it cannot be overstated how incessantly the establishment lapdog media shoved the Al Qaeda terror threat down the public’s throat in those early years of the War of Terror.

Every day brought fresh stories about the incredible global reach of this dastardly terror organization. Anthrax attacks and shoe bombers and terror plots and attacks on the London underground kept the threat front and centre in the public consciousness. Colour-coded terror alerts became an easy Pavlovian tool for keeping the masses in a perpetual state of fear.

In short, Al Qaeda and the attendant threat of terrorism became the organizing principal of our political universe. We were asked to believe that the War of Terror was the single most important thing in the world and that civilization itself hinged on the outcome of this historic battle.

But then a funny thing happened. Political priorities began to shift. Al Qaeda and 9/11 were no longer the focal point of every political conversation. And, as the Al Qaeda bogeyman started to fade in the cultural imagination, the US and its allies began playing footsie with some of the self-same bearded terrorists with whom they were supposedly locked in mortal combat.

This remarkable transformation from Big Bad Al Qaeda to Useful Ally Al Qaeda began in Libya, where a US-backed NATO coalition began openly working with known terrorists in order to achieve their goal of ousting Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. That campaign led not only to the US fighting on the same side as the Islamic State and other Al Qaeda-linked fighters, but it also resulted in Benghazigate, which, as it turned out, was the disastrous end to the CIA’s otherwise successful operation running guns and supplies out of Libya in order to arm “opposition groups” in Syria.

But it was in Syria, not Libya, where the makeover of Al Qaeda from the fearsome embodiment of evil to allies of convenience reached its apotheosis. Over the course of the 2010s, those with their heads screwed on straight watched this remarkable transformation with mouths agape. Yes, the US was now openly working with Al Qaeda, and the public was being asked to swallow this alliance as if there were nothing unusual about this complete 180 degree shift.

That the US ended up in the odd position of supporting Al Qaeda “opposition groups” in Syria is not a fringe conspiracy theory. It is a cold, hard fact that was (uncomfortably) admitted by the likes of former US Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry and (awkwardly) hand-waved away by a series of establishment think tank stooges.

Stooges like:

Charles Lister, who penned “Syria’s insurgency beyond Good guys and Bad guys“ for Foreign Policy in 2013, in which he wrote: “Like it or not, groups on the more extreme end of the spectrum, particularly those affiliated with al Qaeda, have proven remarkably adept at spreading their military resources across large swathes of territory.”
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Senior Fellow Ed Husain, who wrote “Al-Qaeda’s Specter in Syria” in 2012, noting: “The Syrian rebels would be immeasurably weaker today without Al Qaeda in their ranks.”
Barak Mendelson, who authored “Accepting Al Qaeda: The Enemy of the United States’ Enemy“ in 2015, arguing: “Since 9/11, Washington has considered Al Qaeda the greatest threat to the United States, one that must be eliminated regardless of cost or time. [...] But the instability in the Middle East following the Arab revolutions and the meteoric rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) require that Washington rethink its policy toward Al Qaeda.”

In other words, to paraphrase Orwell, after 9/11 we were asked to believe that “We are at war with Al Qaeda. We have always been at war with Al Qaeda.” But by the time of the Syria campaign, we were told Al Qaeda are our allies and “We’re at war with Syria. We have always been at war with Syria.”

Now, if you were to take the Al Qaeda story at face value, at this point it would be hard to deny that Al Qaeda won. They successfully struck the heart of the American Empire on 9/11 and now they enjoy Uncle Sam’s support.

But surely we’re not going to take the Al Qaeda story at face value, are we?

WHAT IS AL QAEDA?

Those possessed with a modicum of sense will no doubt already know that:

“Al Qaeda” did not knock down three buildings with two planes in New York.

“Al Qaeda” did not have operatives photographing themselves celebrating the attacks as they were taking place.

“Al Qaeda” did not profit from trading on advance knowledge of the attacks or from WTC insurance schemes or from recovered gold loots.

“Al Qaeda” did not schedule dozens of war games, simulations and exercises—including “drills” of planes flying into government buildings—on the day of 9/11.

“Al Qaeda” did not cover up all the evidence of those attacks or steward the congressional investigation into those attacks or write the work of fiction that is the 9/11 Commission Report.

In fact, as viewers of my extensive, three-part, five-and-a-half-hour long documentary, False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda will know, “Al Qaeda” is really better identified as Al-CIA-da.

Yes, from the arming and funding of America’s “warrior for peace” Osama bin Laden during the Soviet-Afghan War

...to the remarkable story of Ali Mohamed, Al Qaeda’s unlikely “triple agent” at Fort Bragg

...to the mysterious protection of the WTC 1993 conspirators

...to the mysterious protection of the 9/11 hijacker patsies

...to the absurd story of Osama bin Laden’s escape to Pakistan and the even more absurd story of his dispatch at the hands of US special forces

...to the rise of ISIS under the watchful eye of the Defense Intelligence Agency

...to the deliberate cooperation with Al Qaeda in Syria,

the history of “Al Qaeda” has been a chronicle of intelligence agency complicity with, support of and funding for the supposed terrorists.

Given the reality of this thoroughly documented history, it should not be at all surprising that we now find Al Qaeda being whitewashed by their US/NATO/Israeli sponsors and handed the keys to the Syrian kingdom.

Indeed, “Al Qaeda” is at last revealed to be what it always was: a deep state cutout that could serve as a pawn on the grand chessboard. Whether that pawn was expected to play for the black team, a fearsome enemy whose presence in this or that square of the chessboard could justify a full-scale invasion by the valiant US allies, or whether that pawn was expected to play for the white team, a convenient ally who could help the US allies secure a coveted piece of the chessboard, the result is the same: Al Qaeda is nothing more and nothing less than Al CIA-da.

The bright side of all this is that the entire charade is remarkably easy to detect. All that it requires is the slightest sliver of historical memory and the ability to see through the establishment propaganda to the facts that they obscure. The only question is whether enough of the public has been shaken from their slumbers by the 9/11 Truth movement and the COVID resistance movement to arrive at the self-evident truth.

Source: The Corbett Report

Search This Blog

The Post-Partisan Emporium