The Post-Partisan Emporium

The Evolution of the “No-Virus” Theory Julie Beal The no-virus theory was proposed by Stefan Lanka in the late 1990s, riding hot on the heels of his new-found fame as an AIDS dissident. Lanka, a marine biologist, first became interested in the HIV controversy after an Austrian professor called Fritz Pohl told him, “ the official version of HIV and AIDS did not ‘add up.'” After doing some independent research, Lanka decided it would be a good idea to deny the existence of  all  viruses, rather than just HIV. “ It became clear to me,”  he said, “that if I only criticised the postulate of a single virus and did not mention the rest, I was reinforcing the virus theory. And if I did not challenge the conceptual framework from which that theory springs, I was reinforcing it. (Translated from German, this quote is taken from an interview with Lanka in 2021.) In a 1998 interview with  Zenger’s magazine , Lanka explained that he had a series of realisations which led him to conclude the arg

The Vindication of D.A. Henderson  BY  JEFFREY A. TUCKER   e were going to invent pandemic planning.”  Those were the words of Dr. Rajeev Venkayya in 2005 when he headed the White House bioterrorism study group under George W. Bush. “We want to use all instruments of national power to confront this threat,” Venkayya told colleagues in the administration, as reported by Michael Lewis in his book  The Premonition .  That was the birth of the idea of national lockdown for pathogenic threat. To mainstream epidemiologists, the idea seemed crazy and potentially ruinous at the time, a fact that only emboldened its creators. Venkayya’s colleague computer scientist Robert Glass told Lewis: I asked myself, “Why didn’t these epidemiologists figure it out?” They didn’t figure it out because they didn’t have tools that were focused on the problem. They had tools to understand the movement of infectious diseases without the purpose of trying to stop them. Another convert to the idea, Dr. Carter Mech

See if you can find out measures that affect the SRF & Billionaires!  Private jets, Yachts, Smaller mansions, smaller cars and so on...  Emergency measures can quickly cut global oil demand by 2.7 million barrels a day, reducing the risk of a damaging supply crunch 18 March 2022 In the face of the emerging global energy crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, practical actions by governments and citizens in advanced economies and beyond can achieve significant reductions in oil demand in a matter of months, reducing the risk of a major supply crunch, according to new analysis released by the International Energy Agency today. These efforts would reduce the price pain being felt by consumers around the world, lessen the economic damage, shrink Ru