The Truth about Ivermectin and Hunter Biden's Laptop Comes Out
The Truth about Ivermectin and Hunter Biden's Laptop Comes Out
“A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” - Mark Twain
Well, well. Ivermectin isn’t really just horse paste. Hunter Biden’s laptop is real. What’s going on? Why is the truth coming out now?
Twitter never gave me a reason why I was permanently banned, but I assumed it was because of my essay The People's Medicine vs Merck's Billion $ Pill, published in October of 2021. In it, I described how the FDA colluded with Merck to destroy ivermectin’s reputation so the drug company could market a new drug, molnupiravir, in its place.
I lost friends because of that essay. People made fun of me. Friends and family were concerned about my mental state. I was succumbing to QAnon. It wouldn’t be long before I joined a cult. Oh dear!
There were people who lost much more than that for standing up for the truth. Doctors lost their jobs. People lost their lives.
Now, the truth is coming out about ivermectin. Just like other stories. Like how the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop was purposely denied in the days leading up to the 2020 presidential election.
Twitter played a huge role in influencing the elections and destroying ivermectin’s reputation.
RadarOnline.com confirms that Elon Musk has now promised to provide full disclosure regarding why Twitter decided to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story.
“Raise your hand if you think [Musk] should make public all internal discussions about the decision to censor the story on Hunter Biden's laptop before the 2020 Election in the interest of Transparency.”
To which Musk responded, “This is necessary to restore public trust.”
It is now revealed that the FBI pressured social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook to suppress the story. In October of 2020, Twitter suspended the New York Post’s account over its “Bombshell Hunter Biden Story”.
One has to wonder how the presidential election would have gone if the truth had been available during that critical time.
But we are so over Truth in our society. Nobody is interested in offensive “absolutes” that would deny me the right to “my truth”. The idea that there could be some kind of over-arching immutable truth about anything is impossible now.
Still, to this day, if you ask the average guy on the street about Hunter’s laptop, either they won’t know what you’re talking about, or they will still say it’s a Russian conspiracy, or they will say, it turned out to be true, so what, if suppressing the truth stopped Trump from becoming president, then it was justified—for the “greater good”.
Equally, one wonders how preventive treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine might have changed the course of Covid if they had not been demonized by the press.
Like Hunter’s laptop, the campaign to discredit these drugs was so successful that most people still think ivermectin’s only use is for horses. People continue to parrot the jokes that they heard on social media. They never consider that behind those jokes are countless tragic stories of people being denied treatment and dying as a result. Doctors were not allowed to try any preventive treatments and the sick were advised to sit at home until they were so ill that they were finally admitted to hospital, and many ended up dying in isolation on a ventilator.
The FDA gave credence to those lies by posting an Aug. 21, 2021, tweet, linking to an FDA page, that is now at the center of a court case. In my essay, I mentioned this tweet:
At the time, I was appalled. It was hard to fathom why the FDA would purposely make fun of anyone who used ivermectin, a drug that had been safely used in humans for 35 years.
Out of curiosity, I researched what was in molnupiravir. Interestingly, it is described as having first been investigated as a treatment for Venezuelan equine encephalitis, a sleeping sickness that infects horses.
Dr. Pierre Kory, the president of Frontline Covid19 Critical Care Alliance and one of the most prominent advocates of ivermectin, has stated that molnupiravir acts in a similar way to ivermectin.
For the FDA to malign ivermectin while pushing molnupiravir proves it had other motives besides helping Americans stay healthy. Suppressing the truth about Hunter’s laptop was bad enough but suppressing the truth about a drug that could have potentially saved hundreds of thousands of lives, is downright evil.
The World Health Organization backed up the FDA’s position, recommending against using ivermectin for Covid treatment.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second biggest sponsor after the USA.
The GAVI Alliance, a private/public organization promoting vaccines founded by Gates, are the 4th biggest sponsor to WHO. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director-General, served on the GAVI board for several years. The WHO, in 2021 changed the definition of “herd immunity”, to occurring only when the global population has been vaccinated.
Time after time in my essays I have exposed this incestuous relationship between these organizations. But why would they work so hard in concerted effort to discredit this drug?
There are two reasons that stand out and both have to do with money.
Merck’s patent on ivermectin had run out so the company could not make money off of it. Instead, Merck received a staggering $1.2 billion government contract for molnupiravir, with the promise of $355 million for between 60,000 and 100,000 doses. Where ivermectin costs $26 per treatment plan, the Biden administration paid $700 for a five-day course of molnupiravir pills, even though it costs a mere $17.74 to produce.
If drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine worked against Covid, there would have been no reason to produce vaccines under emergency authorization. The vaccine rollout, outside of trials, would become illegal. Drug companies that had spent hundreds of million dollars developing and testing vaccines during a pandemic, would not have seen the $100bn they were expecting in 2021.
In September, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) urged the federal district court in Galveston to allow the lawsuit to proceed against the FDA for its misleading statements against ivermectin.
The lawsuit states that the FDA published “multiple statements and sent letters to influential organizations to falsely disparage the drug, implying that it was not approved for treating Covid-19. Many, including courts and state medical boards, were misled by the FDA into thinking that its lack of approval for this treatment meant that ivermectin should not be used to treat Covid-19.”
“AAPS writes in its amicus brief to the court, ‘Not only is off-label prescribing fully proper, legal, and commonplace, but it is also absolutely necessary in order to give effective care to patients.’”
The truth is now coming out. It remains to be seen if it will have any influence on future policies. Just as you can now find articles admitting to the validity of The New York Post’s Hunter Biden story, if you Google ivermectin, you will find search results such as this February 2021 article from the National Library of Medicine:
A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness.
Why, then, was my essay of October 2021, written eight months later, flagged as dangerous misinformation?
Because at that time, such articles—even the one I site above which was from the government’s very own NIH, National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information website, were being suppressed by Google.
At least, I never saw the article at that time, but I can see it now. What you did find were article after article scaring people out of using ivermectin. And you still find them today. You still find the FDAs article warning people not to use ivermectin for Covid, with the picture of the horse.
This is beyond disturbing.
Here are some basic facts about ivermectin, collected by Henderson and Hooper:
It has been safely used by humans for 35 years and over 4 billion doses have been administered world-wide.
Ivermectin is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines.
Ivermectin fights 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. A single dose reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours, according to a June 2020 study published in the journal Antiviral Research.
Some 70 clinical trials are evaluating the use of ivermectin for treating Covid-19. The statistically significant evidence suggests that it is safe and works for both treating and preventing the disease.
In 115 patients with Covid-19 who received a single dose of ivermectin, none developed pneumonia or cardiovascular complications, while 11.4% of those in the control group did.
Ivermectin can help prevent Covid-19. One 2020 article in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications looked at what happened after the drug was given to family members of confirmed Covid-19 patients. Less than 8% became infected, versus 58.4% of those untreated.
Out of four billion doses administered since 1998, there have been only 28 cases of serious neurological adverse events, according to an article published this year in the American Journal of Therapeutics. The same study found that ivermectin has been used safely in pregnant women, children and infants.
And there you have it.
Sadly, most people will never learn these facts. Even if you show them to their faces, they will not see it. They are too invested in the lies.
To accept that there is one over-arching truth would infringe on the carefully crafted world of illusions that most people now live in. If everything we’ve been told about ivermectin was a lie, then what else could be a lie?
It isn’t just about this one lie. It’s about the motivations behind it and the implications that arise because of it. It’s about realizing that for our government, for these drug companies, for these world health organizations, it’s not about our health and safety. No matter how many times they say it is—it’s a lie. It’s about power and greed. It’s about letting people die rather than telling the truth.
There is such a thing as Truth. And unless we get back to it, no matter how much proof comes out about these stories, no justice will ever come of it.
Comments
Post a Comment