The Animals Speak: The Plandemonium Was Overblown

The Animals Speak: The Plandemonium Was Overblown







"Well, amongst my apes and my primates, definitely there was none [COVID-19]...my colleagues were self-reporting to me that there was none among theirs, either." -Leo Biddle

We are all looking for good data and information from which to assess exactly what took place during the pandemic. Sometimes, the best way to build a Big Picture from which to understand the world is to find unique vectors of approach to gathering information. Your "knowledge scaffolding" determines your resistance to information games (mind manipulation), so it's best to engineer that scaffolding with as many tools as possible. Great Ape conservationist Leo Biddle brushed back personal attacks and cancellation in his community to share his unique vantage point that will provide many with a more secure framework for understanding the plandemonium.

Clearly I'm not self-censoring in these discussions, and I think we poked the YouTube censors squarely in the eye (and then the other eye) with this discussion which laid out the lack of COVID-19 in 2020 among animals and the primates in particular, but deaths in (Western zoos) during 2021 after vaccines began to be administered to animals. Leo even shares his take on the use of conservation NGOs as fronts for social engineering, and participation by the intelligence communities. The conversation really just kept gaining steam once we got it well on track.

Prior to talking with Leo, I did a bit of my own information gathering about COVID-19 in animals. My friend and DRASTIC researcher Charles Rixey pointed out that no animals at the Wuhan wet market or in Wuhan at all had ever tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. And while researching the negative of such a statement to any complete degree is always difficult, NPR pointed me to Complexity Science Hub's tracker of COVID-19 cases in animals.

Complexity Science Hub Vienna/Screenshot by NPR

I've also cataloged research about animals susceptible to or claimed to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 (Damas et al, 2020) as well as specific animal research such as that on the white tailed deer population (Kuchipudi et al, 2021). It is noteworthy that in China, the only animals to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 were housepets: cats, dogs, and hamsters. This is true throughout East Asia, though a few beavers tested positive in Mongolia, and a few big cats (lions and tigers) in Southeast Asia. Collectively, this appears to be another big hit to the zoonotic origins hypothesis pushed so hard by the Fauci-centered "mainstream" scientific establishment. And while the image above could represent testing bias (at least outside Wuhan itself), the information at face value is suggestive that SARS-CoV-2 may indeed have originated in the West as some independent researchers have conjectured.

Then again, I have no strong reason to believe that less than 2,000 positive tests on pets and a handful of lab animals can't be chalked up to false positives—particularly after seeing one of Leo's slides about 45 cycle count limits on PCR. So, for the moment, I hold back on seeing the information as particularly meaningful—particularly after hearing Leo say that none of his colleagues saw animals getting sick throughout the whole of 2020. Then again, why were cases of myocarditis in cows throughout South America being studied prior to the admitted Wuhan outbreak (Margineda et al, 2019)? I would also ask if mice were being euthanized in Western labs (Grimm, 2020) because Omicron shows clear signs of passage through the tiny mammals (Diamond et al, 2021).

On the other end of the spectrum of credible research, a bizarre plethora of fishy SARS-CoV-2 stories came out of China as part of the plandemonium information firehose. Apparently China is still pushing the fish sticks hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 got to China via frozen food shipments.

And, here we are in 2022, with swabbing of fish, which are not carriers of coronaviruses, for whatever purpose, whether that's to detect a pathogen or generate anxiety amongst the gullible.

It's no wonder people are confused to the point that few if any of us feel entirely confident with our understanding of the totality of the evidence.

Moving forward in the plandemonium timeline, only after the vaccines were rolled out, we did start to see captive animals perish, or lash out in unusual ways.

And those are just the tigers. I don't have anything like time for full documentation, but we know that tigers were targeted for vaccination in particular.

While my conversation with Leo did not move linearly like a presentation, the slides he presented were part of an organized presentation that he gave for Pandata, which is how we met. Pandata presentations are of uniformly high quality, and a few of them, such as Leo's gripped me due to their uniqueness. I can't say enough good things about the people at Pandata, and while I generally keep organizations at arm's length due to scarcity of time, I'm glad to have joined Pandata myself and encourage those wanting to see a few more different angles to thumb through their videos.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Next Step for the World Economic Forum

The State of Emergency, Coercive Medicine, and Academia

What the Media Is HIDING About Ukraine/Russia